Chocolate Lab;2962458 said:That club has been around since early 2007.
JonJon;2962463 said:Well I'm definitely uniformed. Anyone care to fill me in on all the GROW, GROZ, and GROWN talk?
ChldsPlay;2962468 said:I say it's time for BBZ - Bring Back Zimmer. Call me crazy, but I liked those defenses that usually didn't give up a lot of points.
Faerluna;2962500 said:Grow.....up?
Monster Heel;2962505 said:I take it you forgot Zimmer's grand meltdown back in 06.
ChldsPlay;2962721 said:I don't want Zimmer to run Parcell's 3-4. I'd want him to run his 4-3.
ChldsPlay;2962468 said:I say it's time for BBZ - Bring Back Zimmer. Call me crazy, but I liked those defenses that usually didn't give up a lot of points.
ChldsPlay;2962721 said:I don't want Zimmer to run Parcell's 3-4. I'd want him to run his 4-3.
dbair1967;2962733 said:OMG, you have got to be kidding.
That last drive the Giants had the other night against us? That was ROUTINE in Zimmers tenure here. Thats his MO.
He's a mediocre DC.
ChldsPlay;2962770 said:Sure his defense gave up plenty of drives at the end of games, but his defenses were on the field forever and got virtually no support from the offense. He wouldn't have that problem with the offense the Cowboys have now. I don't think Bengal fans are complaining anywhere near as much as fans here are, certainly not about the D, and wouldn't you know it, the Bengals are playing good D with Roy Williams!! It can't be!!
I'll take a guy that generally produces a defense that doesn't give up a lot of points, even if a few of those points happen to be at the end of the game. I'm more concerned about the total number of points given up in a game than WHEN they are scored. I wouldn't care if the Giants scored all of their points in the last 5 minutes of the game if it had only been 30 points.
Not to mention that the talent level the vast majority of time he was here was pretty much ****.
dbair1967;2962785 said:ok...whatever