DuaneThomas71
Benched
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 0
(Hooray, another T.O. thread)
I couldn't resist, but I was thinking about this some more this morning.
Why do people want to cut him? Because cutting him will "remove distractions?"
Let me ask you something: What do you think would pose a bigger distraction to the team? Terrell Owens being here or Terrell Owens not being here?
I'm sorry, but has anyone taken the time to think about what the fallout would be from cutting him?
Do you honestly believe that T.O. would just go quietly into the night?
If this were to happen, he'd be telling everyone in the media (as they lined up to talk to him) all sorts of things about the Cowboys. He'd be attacking Jerry Jones and anyone else as he saw fit. The focus would remain on Dallas for months after his release. The daily questions would turn into "Do you think you can win without T.O.?" and "Do you agree with what T.O. told us 50,000 times over the past 3 months?"
The friends he has on the team would line up to defend him. Then others would try to stay out of it, because they personally liked him, but don't want to get in the middle of it. Then there'd be a few (Bobby Carpenter and maybe a few others) who would try to spin it as a positive thing for "chemistry" or whathaveyou. Either way, T.O. would still remain the focus of Cowboys camp LONG after his release.
T.O. will always have an audience. And if it involves our Cowboys, there will undoubtedly be some people who give things he says some credence, even if they personally bashed him throughout his career. If he takes shots at Jerry Jones, who is going to say he's wrong? If he says something about Tony Romo, are people really not going to absorb some of it?
He would have nothing to lose because his career would be over. And you know when a man is most dangerous. For all we know, he could sign with ESPN after that and use it as a platform to bash the Cowboys.
This notion that by cutting T.O., we'll actually "lessen distractions" is naive rationale if you ask me. Not that I personally believe these intangible elements really matter, but to those who do, I question the logic here.
I couldn't resist, but I was thinking about this some more this morning.
Why do people want to cut him? Because cutting him will "remove distractions?"
Let me ask you something: What do you think would pose a bigger distraction to the team? Terrell Owens being here or Terrell Owens not being here?
I'm sorry, but has anyone taken the time to think about what the fallout would be from cutting him?
Do you honestly believe that T.O. would just go quietly into the night?
If this were to happen, he'd be telling everyone in the media (as they lined up to talk to him) all sorts of things about the Cowboys. He'd be attacking Jerry Jones and anyone else as he saw fit. The focus would remain on Dallas for months after his release. The daily questions would turn into "Do you think you can win without T.O.?" and "Do you agree with what T.O. told us 50,000 times over the past 3 months?"
The friends he has on the team would line up to defend him. Then others would try to stay out of it, because they personally liked him, but don't want to get in the middle of it. Then there'd be a few (Bobby Carpenter and maybe a few others) who would try to spin it as a positive thing for "chemistry" or whathaveyou. Either way, T.O. would still remain the focus of Cowboys camp LONG after his release.
T.O. will always have an audience. And if it involves our Cowboys, there will undoubtedly be some people who give things he says some credence, even if they personally bashed him throughout his career. If he takes shots at Jerry Jones, who is going to say he's wrong? If he says something about Tony Romo, are people really not going to absorb some of it?
He would have nothing to lose because his career would be over. And you know when a man is most dangerous. For all we know, he could sign with ESPN after that and use it as a platform to bash the Cowboys.
This notion that by cutting T.O., we'll actually "lessen distractions" is naive rationale if you ask me. Not that I personally believe these intangible elements really matter, but to those who do, I question the logic here.