Has Romo really been bad this year? *LONG*

dstovall5

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
2,211

*WARNING* - This is a long post, it covers all of the games he has played this year!



I've seen posts around here stating how bad Romo has been, but has he really been bad this year? Or is that just the perception of unrealistic fans? Well, here's my take of his performance thus far.


Week 1 - NYG - (36/49 263 YDS 2 TDS 1 INT)
--------------------
1st half 25/34 188 YDS 1 TD 1 INT ////////////////////////////////// 2nd half *bruised ribs* 11/17 75 YDS 1 TD 0 INT

Romo had a pretty good day to start off the season, though he didn't have an eye popping game it was still good enough to pull out the W. His only interception came near the goal line of the Giants, Terrance Williams ran the wrong route leaving Tony out to dry on this one. Luckily it wasn't a pick 6. We punted the ball 6 times (50%) during the game, and it didn't help that we had a couple penalties and sacks to force those.

Low/High Grade - B-/B

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 2 - KC - (30/42 298 1 TD 0 INT)
-----------------
1st half *bruised ribs* 14/19 168 YDS 1 TD 0 INT ////////// 2nd half *bruised ribs* 16/23 130 YDS 0 TD 0 INT

Romo had a good game despite playing with bruised ribs. He missed a couple early throws and one in particular would've been a TD, though it still was a 50+ yard gain. As the game progressed Romo's accuracy worsened (missed easy throws), it seemed like his shots wore off and his ribs started acting up again. We punted the ball 4 times (33%), but we had sacks and penalties to help force those. It also didn't help we had 2 crucial fumbles and a crucial drop late in the game that could've potentially been a TD. If Romo is healthy, then chances are we pull this game out.

Low/High Grade - B-/B

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 3 - STL - (17/24 210 YDS 3 TDS 0 INT)
-------------------
1st half 12/16 112 YDS 1 TD 0 INT ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 5/8 98 YDS 2 TDs 0 INT

Romo had a stellar game, but he also had a stellar running game to keep the defense on their toes. Romo was very accurate and pretty much threw the ball at will for the whole game. Most likely would've had 4 TDs this game, but Escobar couldn't get his feet down early in the game on a fade route. We looked like an offense this game.

Low/High Grade - A/A+

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 4 - SD - (27/37 246 YDS / 2 TDS / 0 INT)
-----------------
1st half 10/15 115 YDS 2 TD 0 INT ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 11/15 131 YDS 0 TD 0 INT

Romo started slow and was a little off, but it didn't help that SD was creating pressure early on. During the 2nd quarter Romo moved the ball better and put up 21 points, with the help of Sean Lee. We also ended up missing a 56 yard FG which proved fatal in the end. During the 3rd quarter we only had the ball once, and ended up punting. Down by 9 Romo got the ball with 7 minutes to go and drove us down to SD's 7 yard line, with 3 minutes remaining. He then hit Williams on a quick pass, but Williams ended up fumbling on the 1 yard line. Ball game.

Low/High Grade - B/B+

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 5 - DEN - (25/36 506 YDS 5 TDS 1 INT)
-------------------
1st half 14/19 222 YDS 1 TD 0 INT /////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 11/17 284 YDS / 4 TDS / 1 INT

Romo came out chunking the ball and got us to a 14-0 lead. Sadly it didn't last long as we were down 28 - 17 with 40 seconds remaining in the half. With no timeouts Romo made a pretty pass to Williams for a long gain to set up the FG at the end of the half. After the defense gave up another TD to start the half, Romo came back and connected to Williams on a deep pass for an 82 yard TD. Denver answered with a FG, and then Romo answered it back with a long drive for the TD to Dez. Shortly after, Manning got intercepted and Romo capitalized by hitting Witten 3 times in a row for the TD to take the lead. Denver then tied it back up 41-41 with a FG, but Romo found Dez on a 79 yarder and then hit Beasely for the TD. Then came our defense doing what it does best, we gave up a TD late in the 4th to keep it at 48 even. With 2 minutes left on our 14 (Romo was sacked), Romo tried to hit Escobar but ended up throwing an interception. Ball game, game should've been a blow out in Dallas's favor, but nope.

Low/High Grade - A+/A++

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 6 - Wash - (18/30 170 YDS 1 TD 1 INT)
---------------------
1st half 12/19 96 YDS 0 TD 1 INT //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 6/14 74 YDS 1 TD 0 INT

Romo came out moving the chains nicely to set up a Murray TD to start the game. On his second drive of the game he was doing the same thing. He was moving the chains until one of their DE's made a great play by tipping the ball up in the air which caused it to be intercepted. Wasn't really a bad throw, just more of a great defensive play. Next drive T-Fred had a 10 yard penalty which ended up forcing us to punt. After Harris's second long return of the day, Romo avoided pressure on a roll out and threw a dime to Williams for the TD. Might be his best throw of the year, I honestly thought he was throwing it away. On the next drive Romo missed some throws, through the game he had a few errant throws. On Romo's last drive throwing the ball he looked good, he was moving the chains nicely until Williams made it 2nd and 20 with a penalty. Over the next two drives all he did was run the ball to end the game. Overall, it was his worst game of the season up to that point, though he still wasn't terrible.

Low/High Grade - C-/C

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 7 - PHI - (28/47 317 YDS 1 TD 2 INTS)
------------------
1st half 11/23 160 YDS 0 TD 1 int /////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 17/24 157 YDS 1 TD 1 INT

This game our whole offense was sluggish, more so then normal, it basically turned out to be a punt fest (18 punts combined). We had crucial penalties and sacks which led to a high amount of punts. Romo wasn't as bad as the box score would indicate, though he wasn't great either. Dez let a 50 yard TD pass go right through his hands for an interception. Also, Tanner ran the wrong route causing Romo's 2nd interception, which pretty much summed up our offense that game. We looked sluggish, had a high amount of penalties, sacks on key downs, and we also had a couple of drops.

Low/High Grade - C/C+

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 8 - DET - (14/30 206 YDS 3 TD 0 INT)
-------------------
1st half 8/17 66 YDS 1 TD 0 INT /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 6/13 140 YDS 2 TD 0 INT

Here's a statistic to chew on before we talk about this game, Romo was pressured on 47% of his pass attempts, the most in his career since 2009 (according to PFF). For comparison sake, Stafford was pressured on 27% of his pass attempts. Romo had a good game, especially considering the cards he was dealt. For the majority of the game his offensive line was getting whooped around, especially during the first half. When Romo had pass protection, he was easily the best QB on the field, in which he was 11 of 16 for 190 yds, 3 td, 0 int, and a 148.4 rating. There was a couple times where his WRs bailed him out with great plays, but there were also times in which they dropped easy balls (Williams was the main one). Overall, despite dealing with pressure on half of his throws, he still had a good game in which we should've won.

Low/High Grade - B/B+

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 9
- MIN - (34-51 337 YDS 2 TDS 1 INT)
------------------
1st half 13/20 120 YDS 0 TD 0 INT /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 21/31 217 2 TDS 1 INT

Romo had a good game, though the 6 or 7 drops didn't help one bit. He had some balls sail on him or just completely off the mark, but that's to be expected when you throw the ball 51 times. For the most part though, his accuracy was on and he was able to give his WRs a chance to make a play. Romo had a couple drives ended because of sacks, but overall his pass protection was good. Although Romo had a good game, he almost put the dagger himself in the Cowboy's back. Down 23-20 with 5 minutes left on the clock, Romo had a chance to once again settle the "choker" label, so what does he do? Come 3rd and 9 he tries to force a tight ball to Williams, who gets his route jumped by a DB and the inevitable interception occurs. Luckily for us and Romo our defense forced a 3 and out to give #9 a second chance. He didn't waste it either, he put together a drive from our 10 completing 7/9 passes and throwing the go ahead TD pass to Harris. He was spreading the ball wonderfully on that drive, he even decided to give a pass to the ref, though the ref didn't exactly catch it .... Overall, Romo had a good game and conducted a 90 yard GW drive, can't ask for more then that.

Low/High Grade - B+/A-

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week 10 - NO - (10/24 128 YDS 1 TD 0 INT)
--------------------
1st half 3/9 20 YDS 0 TD 0 INT ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2nd half 7/15 108 YDS 1 TD 0 INT

I'm not going to lie, I missed a lot of this game, so I'm just going to go over what I did see. Romo was inaccurate for the majority of the game I watched, and we also killed ourselves with stupid penalties. I seen Witten had another drop, and also Romo over threw Dez for a wide open TD. I seen a couple things I did like though, but there wasn't much. I liked how we kicked the onside kick to at least attempt to catch back up, even though we just went 3 and out. I also liked the play where Romo swapped Dez and Beasely which led to our biggest gain of the night, we need to see more of that in our offense. Overall, I watched sporadically, but the parts I did watch was a complete mess. It was easily Romo's worse game of the year, at least the parts I saw, though it seemed like he played a little better in the 2nd half. Sadly I can't say anything different for our team as a whole either, everyone looked horrible except Harris (special teams). This is the type of game you burn the game film and never speak of again, it never happened.

Low/High Grade - F/D-

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Overall he has played very good this season, though he has had a couple off games. I view it as he's had 3 GREAT games (DEN,STL,MIN), 2 VERY GOOD games (SD, DET), 2 GOOD games (NYG, KC), 2 OK games (WAS, PHI), and 1 BAD game (NO).

Low/High Season Grade (thus far) - B/B+

So what do you guys think? Am I way off base here on my assessment of Romo's play this far into the season? I've seen many people post that Romo hasn't been that good this season, but I think they're over reacting just like usual. The dude has still played like a top QB in NFL, even if he is having a "bad" year. In reality, there's only 5-6 QBs who are playing at the same level he is this year. Enjoy it while it last, because he's not always going to be here.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
In summary:
Look at these stats... Romo is awesome!

You know who also has great stats? For all you basketball fans:
Michael Beasley, Brandon Jennings, Monta Ellis.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
His overall stats are top notch, however, if you dig deeper you'll notice Romo has been averaging a 54% completion rate over the past 5 games (since the Denver game) which is the worst 5 game stretch of his entire career. 54% isn't good.

This $64,000 question is whether this is a blip, a coincidence, or a trend.
 

jwitten82

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,630
Reaction score
16,593
His overall stats are top notch, however, if you dig deeper you'll notice Romo has been averaging a 54% completion rate over the past 5 games (since the Denver game) which is the worst 5 game stretch of his entire career.

This $64,000 question is whether this is a blip, a coincidence, or a trend.

If Romo continues this downward spiral until the end of the season, then we`ll know Romo is on the decline.
 

dstovall5

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
2,211
His overall stats are top notch, however, if you dig deeper you'll notice Romo has been averaging a 54% completion rate over the past 5 games (since the Denver game) which is the worst 5 game stretch of his entire career.

This $64,000 question is whether this is a blip, a coincidence, or a trend.

This is definitely a good question. I personally think it's just due to when he gets pressure on him. This year pressure seems to rattle him a lot more then usual. For example, in that Detroit game when he was pressured he was 3 of 14 for 16 yds, that's down right terrible. But when he wasn't pressured he went 11 of 16 for 190 yds and 3 tds. Hopefully it's just a coincidence though ...
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
This is definitely a good question. I personally think it's just due to when he gets pressure on him. This year pressure seems to rattle him a lot more then usual. For example, in that Detroit game when he was pressured he was 3 of 14 for 16 yds, that's down right terrible. But when he wasn't pressured he went 11 of 16 for 190 yds and 3 tds. Hopefully it's just a coincidence though ...

Romo can't handle the pressure like he could when he was younger. I think the years of playing behind a bad oline has made him gunshy. I think he has shown a little less ability to escape this year from the pressure. Add in that his arm seems weaker and it points to a QB in decline.
 

fifaguy

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,016
Reaction score
5,808
he isn't moving out of the pocket nearly as much, over/under throwing passes, seems antsy to get rid of the ball, etc etc. Stats are great and all but its something deeper than that.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
You obviously didn't read it, because it wasn't just about the stats. If you're not going to add anything to the discussion, then don't post. Geez.

I did read it. You're defending Romo by quoting his stats, deflecting blame to other problem areas of the team, and using the "well, if this bad thing didn't happen" argument. I'm tired of defending Romo. Sure, there are teams that are so good that they make their QB look better than they really are (like Seattle, San Fran, Kansas City). But there are also teams that would be horrible if not for their QBs who have still had success and even won Super Bowls (Packers, Patriots, Saints, Colts when Peyton was there).

Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees have had to compensate for their team's flaws and have still won. If they played on teams like Seattle/San Fran/Kansas City they would have more than just one Super Bowl each. My point is, Romo is good enough to win with a great team (Seattle/SF/KC) but not good enough to propel a bad team (Rodgers, Brees).

Every season he has a handful of games where he looks like an elite QB. But he's had many opportunities to get his team into the playoffs (the past two seasons came down to Week 17) and has played his worst ball in those key games. The guy hasn't done anything to show that he's a winning QB. You can quote all the stats and make all the excuses you want. I'm done defending the guy until he proves me wrong.
 

ejwilson1984

Active Member
Messages
236
Reaction score
86
I did read it. You're defending Romo by quoting his stats, deflecting blame to other problem areas of the team, and using the "well, if this bad thing didn't happen" argument. I'm tired of defending Romo. Sure, there are teams that are so good that they make their QB look better than they really are (like Seattle, San Fran, Kansas City). But there are also teams that would be horrible if not for their QBs who have still had success and even won Super Bowls (Packers, Patriots, Saints, Colts when Peyton was there).

Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees have had to compensate for their team's flaws and have still won. If they played on teams like Seattle/San Fran/Kansas City they would have more than just one Super Bowl each. My point is, Romo is good enough to win with a great team (Seattle/SF/KC) but not good enough to propel a bad team (Rodgers, Brees).

Every season he has a handful of games where he looks like an elite QB. But he's had many opportunities to get his team into the playoffs (the past two seasons came down to Week 17) and has played his worst ball in those key games. The guy hasn't done anything to show that he's a winning QB. You can quote all the stats and make all the excuses you want. I'm done defending the guy until he proves me wrong.

+100
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,709
Reaction score
17,370
His overall stats are top notch, however, if you dig deeper you'll notice Romo has been averaging a 54% completion rate over the past 5 games (since the Denver game) which is the worst 5 game stretch of his entire career. 54% isn't good.

This $64,000 question is whether this is a blip, a coincidence, or a trend.

So if you factor in a 7 drop game...how does that affect the 'downfall'...?
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
Here's how I look at it... The NFL average (I just did the math myself) for points scored per game for every team (that's including horrible offenses like the Jags) is 23.2. That means any game they Cowboys fail to score at least 24 should not be blamed on the defense. An average NFL offense should be capable of scoring 24 points, so an offense that considers itself elite or near-elite should have no problem. Well, looking at the schedule so far, we've failed to score 24 in four games. We lost three of the four games we failed to score 24 (the only one we won was the 17-3 game against the Eagles). Therefore, in my opinion, three of our five losses are the offense's fault, not the defense's. That means our offense is more responsible for our mediocre season than our historically bad defense is. And who's the leader of our offense? You guessed it... Mr. Romo. If he's not a major part of the problem, I don't know who is.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,144
Reaction score
20,600
He hasn't played as well as he usually does past 5 games. His timing has been off. For some reason, he's been late with the passes. His passes has been little behind.
 

Deep_South

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,030
Reaction score
3,653
Tony needs to up his game against the Giants, as do Terrance, Beasley, Dez, Witten, the OL, and all of the offensive coaches. We need more out of them in the final six games than we've seen recently. They are going to have to put up a lot of points to win, so they are going to have to take some chances. We can't just keep throwing the ball into the stands until the clock finally expires.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
Romo hasn't been bad this year, because he's 7th in passer rating. But he's been downright average over the last 5 games.

Games 1-5
135 of 188 1523 yds 13 td 2 int 114.3

Games 6-10
104 of 182 1158 yds 8 td 4 int 81.7
 

dstovall5

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
2,211
I did read it. You're defending Romo by quoting his stats, deflecting blame to other problem areas of the team, and using the "well, if this bad thing didn't happen" argument. I'm tired of defending Romo. Sure, there are teams that are so good that they make their QB look better than they really are (like Seattle, San Fran, Kansas City). But there are also teams that would be horrible if not for their QBs who have still had success and even won Super Bowls (Packers, Patriots, Saints, Colts when Peyton was there).

And all those teams have great coaching and the overall TEAM played well in those super bowl runs, not just the QB.

Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees have had to compensate for their team's flaws and have still won. If they played on teams like Seattle/San Fran/Kansas City they would have more than just one Super Bowl each. My point is, Romo is good enough to win with a great team (Seattle/SF/KC) but not good enough to propel a bad team (Rodgers, Brees).

Please, Rodgers and Brees are given a lot more to work with then Romo, they've yet to have to carry a team to the caliber of Romo's. Those guys are given lemons to make lemon juice, while Romo is given oranges to make lemon juice, it's not going to happen. Give Romo either one of those coaching staff and he'd win one, easily.

Every season he has a handful of games where he looks like an elite QB. But he's had many opportunities to get his team into the playoffs (the past two seasons came down to Week 17) and has played his worst ball in those key games. The guy hasn't done anything to show that he's a winning QB. You can quote all the stats and make all the excuses you want. I'm done defending the guy until he proves me wrong.

You're saying all these teams have had playoff success, but did they do it with a 31st running game and an atrocious defense that doesn't create turnovers? Not to even mention those guys have actual coaches, if we had a quality coach this team we would at least be 6-4 right now with a very good chance of being 7-3. Think those QBs you mentioned lose when they post a 5td and 500 yard game? Hell no, because they have an actual team around them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My point was to show that Romo hasn't been as bad as some indicate, and he's not the reason we're 5-5 right now. If we didn't have one of the worst defenses in history and an inept coaching staff, then we easily win the Detroit game and Denver game while sitting at 7-3, instead we're 5-5 heading into a BYE week.

The fact that Romo's stat line in loses is 109/169 for 1384 YDS, 12 TDS, 1 INT, and a 109.7 QBR speaks VOLUMES about how bad his supporting cast actually is. That's by far the worst in the league out of every team, wanna know why? Because the majority of NFL teams have a better supporting cast (defense, coaching, running game) then Dallas, and it's no secret. When a QB post a 100 rating, the average win % in the NFL is 80%, guess what Dallas is when Romo does it? It's 60%, which doesn't surprise me because he has a below average supporting cast.

Above average QB + below average team = average, mediocre, 500%, 5-5
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
And all those teams have great coaching and the overall TEAM played well in those super bowl runs, not just the QB.



Please, Rodgers and Brees are given a lot more to work with then Romo, they've yet to have to carry a team to the caliber of Romo's. Those guys are given lemons to make lemon juice, while Romo is given oranges to make lemon juice, it's not going to happen. Give Romo either one of those coaching staff and he'd win one, easily.



You're saying all these teams have had playoff success, but did they do it with a 31st running game and an atrocious defense that doesn't create turnovers? Not to even mention those guys have actual coaches, if we had a quality coach this team we would at least be 6-4 right now with a very good chance of being 7-3. Think those QBs you mentioned lose when they post a 5td and 500 yard game? Hell no, because they have an actual team around them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My point was to show that Romo hasn't been as bad as some indicate, and he's not the reason we're 5-5 right now. If we didn't have one of the worst defenses in history and an inept coaching staff, then we easily win the Detroit game and Denver game while sitting at 7-3, instead we're 5-5 heading into a BYE week.

The fact that Romo's stat line in loses is 109/169 for 1384 YDS, 12 TDS, 1 INT, and a 109.7 QBR speaks VOLUMES about how bad his supporting cast actually is. That's by far the worst in the league out of every team, wanna know why? Because the majority of NFL teams have a better supporting cast (defense, coaching, running game) then Dallas, and it's no secret. When a QB post a 100 rating, the average win % in the NFL is 80%, guess what Dallas is when Romo does it? It's 60%, which doesn't surprise me because he has a below average supporting cast.

Above average QB + below average team = average, mediocre, 500%, 5-5

The Packers went 15-1 with no running game and a secondary that gave up the most passing yards in NFL history. The Saints were really good two years ago with an atrocious defense. The Giants had the worst pass defense in the NFL and one of the worst running games the last time they won the Super Bowl.

If you read my last post, the offense has failed to score the league average in 4 of our 10 games. The Broncos haven't failed to score 24 yet. 3 of our 5 losses came from not being able to score. 4 of our 5 wins came in games when the defense held teams to an average of 12.25 points per game. That means our offense can't win games when the defense can't hold teams to very low scores. A good offense can outscore a team. Our offense and Romo were only really good in the Broncos game. I'll give you that one. We should have won. But that was one game where Romo put up amazing numbers and still lost. That's your only argument. Outside of the Broncos game, Romo is not having a good season. I don't care about his stats. Have you watched the games?
 

dstovall5

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
2,211
Here's how I look at it... The NFL average (I just did the math myself) for points scored per game for every team (that's including horrible offenses like the Jags) is 23.2. That means any game they Cowboys fail to score at least 24 should not be blamed on the defense. An average NFL offense should be capable of scoring 24 points, so an offense that considers itself elite or near-elite should have no problem.

And this is where that line of thinking is wrong, because not every defense is on the same level, not even close. Think Denver's defense is the same as KC? Kansas City is only allowing 12 points per game, meanwhile Denver is allowing 26 points per game. So an average offense or opponent would score 12 points on KC, and 26 on Denver. We scored 16 on KC, and 48 on Denver, guess we're above average?

Well, looking at the schedule so far, we've failed to score 24 in four games. We lost three of the four games we failed to score 24 (the only one we won was the 17-3 game against the Eagles). Therefore, in my opinion, three of our five losses are the offense's fault, not the defense's.

And that's why you're clueless, but mmk.

That means our offense is more responsible for our mediocre season than our historically bad defense is. And who's the leader of our offense? You guessed it... Mr. Romo. If he's not a major part of the problem, I don't know who is.

Our Offense is ranked 4th in the league in scoring, meanwhile our passing defense is dead last in the league. They're on pace to be one of the worst in the NFL history, but yah it's the offense. Ok, now let me flip this on you.

Our defense is on pace the be one of the worst in NFL history, right? "And who's the leader of our" defense? "You guessed it..." Mr. Sean Lee. "If he's not a major part of the problem I don't know who is." That's basically what you're saying, you sound foolish, but please keep on with this ignorant stuff.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
And this is where that line of thinking is wrong, because not every defense is on the same level, not even close. Think Denver's defense is the same as KC? Kansas City is only allowing 12 points per game, meanwhile Denver is allowing 26 points per game. So an average offense or opponent would score 12 points on KC, and 26 on Denver. We scored 16 on KC, and 48 on Denver, guess we're above average?



And that's why you're clueless, but mmk.



Our Offense is ranked 4th in the league in scoring, meanwhile our passing defense is dead last in the league. They're on pace to be one of the worst in the NFL history, but yah it's the offense. Ok, now let me flip this on you.

Our defense is on pace the be one of the worst in NFL history, right? "And who's the leader of our" defense? "You guessed it..." Mr. Sean Lee. "If he's not a major part of the problem I don't know who is." That's basically what you're saying, you sound foolish, but please keep on with this ignorant stuff.

Sean Lee is a major part of the problem. As excellent as he is, he's had games where he's been awful against the pass. And he's proven once again that he can't stay on the field. We shouldn't have given a massive contract to someone who can't stay healthy.
 
Top