Apluz
Member
- Messages
- 507
- Reaction score
- 0
Joe Rod;3477331 said:There's a major difference between going through the motions enough so that you are not insubordinate and "walking" as the first poster put it. Your point is steering way off from the first post I responded to.
I thought the difference was obvious. It's not steering way off it's called giving a different point of view. Walking would not quite cut it. But how are you going to prove if he is giving less then 100% effor or faking injury?
Joe Rod;3477331 said:I'm not sure you could say that I am kidding while in the same sentence flaunting the known fact that he is guaranteed such a high figure. You don't think that his ex-wife and his baby-momma know about his contract as well???? Child support for his kids alone will surpass your 6 million dollar figure over the next eighteen years. You can't just write a check and make your kids "go away". Child support is the tip of the iceberg with kids. When they want a car, college, wedding, birthday, etc., they are going to come to "dad" who they know made 41 million guaranteed.
In your post you made it seem that he is hurting for money there are 26 million reasons that suggest he is not... and just because he has law suits dose not mean he is hurting. The thing with his Ex was for him to pay what was already mandated for her and his kids by her. Albert was probably late with a payment and she went nuts. That is not a big deal.
You mentioned a car accident in an effort to further illustrate that Albert is hurting for money. But why do you think people pay for auto insurance? Legally the maximum punishment is six months in jail and a $500 fine on the reckless driving charge and 30 days in jail and a $50 fine for the other charge.
The women suing for paternity was not married to Haynesworth so there is no alimony involved. Alimony makes more of a dent in a pay check of a rich man then child support. Again we are talking child support so she is held financially culpable as well don't forget that. Haynesworth could set up a trust account for like a million (likely a lot less) for the kid and not many judges would turn that down. And lets not forget paternity test come back Murry style "You are not the father".
Joe Rod;3477331 said:One additional newsflash. Mikey is already playing games. He failed Haynesworth yesterday for being 1 second behind the "passing time" when he could have easily let him slide. Shannahan wants the team to see who runs the show and he could care less if Albert comes along for the ride. He wasn't the one that gave Albert the contract.
This is why I suggest that Albert could play games too. Not that he will but he could.
What Mike is doing just might blow up in his face... If Albert pushes back! Will be fun to watch it all play out in Commander land!