Vintage;1540301 said:Don't worry. I am willing to give Julius a 4th chance (and a 5th, 6th, and 7th)....
8th time is the charm, I hear...
abersonc;1540387 said:That's a silly comparison - Julius has played well at times in the NFL. Many folks would argue that if he got late game carries that MBIII did, that he would have had a monster year.
Ask yourself this. If Julius was cut today, how long would it take for him to have a new job? He would be claimed immediately.
How long did it take Henson to get a job after he was cut?
Vintage;1540388 said:I am sorry you took a joke for burmafrd seriously.
My apologies.
jobberone;1540711 said:I think Henson played because Jerry pressured him and Parcells put him in to show Jerry he wasn't ready. I don't know this I think it to be so. I also think if that is true Parcells hurt Henson. But I don't think Henson has in in him to be a top flite or even journeyman starter. JMO. But I don't think Parcells did Henson any favors and I seriously doubt if Bill ever wanted him here period much less for a third round pick; which means more to Bill than Jerry anyway.
The guaranteed $3.5 million he got from Dallas isn't chicken feed either.Drew Henson is in Minnesota for one reason.
He wants a job. He is not there for money.
His first baseball contract took care of that.
abersonc;1540714 said:If a coach puts pressure on a player and the player comes away damaged, to me that means the player was just a lump of coal that crumbled. I'll blame a coach for putting a guy in too soon and screwing his confidence, but we are talking about a guy who never was able to get out of the blocks - we saw that in NFLE where he just couldn't make decisions fast enough. This is a case of a guy who was gone from the game too long and nothing more.
Alexander;1540771 said:That is about it in a nutshell.
I am still fascinated by those who feel he was wronged and refuse to lay any responsibility for his failure (both here and in general) on him.
I will watch him play this preseason and I would not be shocked if Tyler Thigpen outplays him.
burmafrd;1540791 said:Several coaches have said that Henson just cannot football think in action. He cannot make the mental adjustments fast enough.
aikemirv;1540834 said:I think we can all see why BP liked Romo so much. Then in comparison to Henson I can see why Bp would have been down on Henson, a guy who came in with all the hype and talent but could just not make it work. I believe Henson just thinks too much. Henson's best games were those first preseason games his first year. Not too much going on in his head and just out there playing football.
I don't blame anything on BP for Henson's failure here, it was just not a good match at all and he had been out of football too long. Plus the developement of Romo pretty much caused BP to give up on Henson and I don't blame him one bit.
You have a guy (in Romo) who makes quick decisions, does not let things get to him and who BP feels has a geat future in comparison to a guy like Henson who just can't get past his own brain to just play football. At some point I think BP just believed Henson's mental makeup would not let him succeed in the NFL.
Going off topic because I am tired of talking about QBs who are no longer here (even ones I really liked). Also because I like hijacked threads.Alexander;1540771 said:That is about it in a nutshell.
I am still fascinated by those who feel he was wronged and refuse to lay any responsibility for his failure (both here and in general) on him.
I will watch him play this preseason and I would not be shocked if Tyler Thigpen outplays him.
Doomsday101;1540842 said:I don't blame BP for Henson but I will say he had no business of seeing any action in his 1st year. After being away from the game he was no where close to being ready to see any action but was thrown out there none the less. Minn right now has been pretty happy with his progress but he still has to earn his way on to their roster and will get his chance.
Hostile;1540846 said:Going off topic because I am tired of talking about QBs who are no longer here (even ones I really liked). Also because I like hijacked threads.
Does anyone know the etymology of this phrase? I've always wondered where it came from and what prompted its use.
aikemirv;1540848 said:I did not have a problem with him playing Henson that Chicago game, I just did not like the conservative passing game that was called in that first half. It was too predictable and short and I believe what caused most of the problems for Henson that game. They needed to open it up that game not throw short and let the defense collapse on him. We were running the ball with ease and we should have opened up the passing game. It was just a poor game plan IMO.
Thanks Kil.Kilyin;1540850 said:Best I could find...
: IN A NUTSHELL - From the archives: Entry for "Nutshell", _Dictionary of Phrase and Fable_, E. Cobham Brewer, 1898: "The Iliad in a nutshell. Pliny tells us that Cicero asserts that the whole Iliad was written on a piece of parchment which might be put into a nutshell. Lalanne describes, in his Curiosités Bibliographiques, an edition of Rochefoucault's Maxims, published by Didot in 1829, on pages one inch square, each page containing 26 lines, and each line 44 letters. Charles Toppan, of New York, engraved on a plate one-eighth of an inch square 12,000 letters. The Iliad contains 501,930 letters, and would therefore occupy 42 such plates engraved on both sides. Huet has proved by experiment that a parchment 27 by 21 centimètres would contain the entire Iliad, and such a parchment would go into a common-sized nut; but Mr. Toppan's engraving would get the whole Iliad into half that size. George P. Marsh says, in his Lectures, he has seen the entire Arabic Koran in a parchment roll four inches wide and half an inch in diameter. (See ILIAD.) 1
: To lie in a nutshell. To be explained in a few words; to be capable of easy solution."