kartr said:
The Commanders having been giving out glowing reports about Jason Campbell and the Packers seemed to be concerned that Aaron Rodgers seems overwhelmed by learning their offense and is not showing the accuracy that he did in college. They know it takes two years for a qb to learn it, but don't think Rodgers will be ahead of the curve. Maybe that's why some reports are that maybe Campbell was the second best qb and not Rodgers in the draft.
Just now saw this.
I challenged you to show me where "Most" scouting reports rated Campbell ahead of Rodgers. You quickly shifted to "some circles" having him ahead.
So, I asked for you to prove those "some circles."
I'm still waiting.
The Commanders took some grief for how much they paid to draft Campbell. Many of their fans were even negative about it. Put yourself in the Commanders PR man's position, would you put out a report that was anything but glowing given the fan displeasure? Be honest.
Also, these reports are from mini camps, not actual Training Camps or work with pads. It will take more than these to convince me of anything. Especially since I never called you on this in the first place. I called you on your inaccurate statement that Campbell was rated ahead of Rodgers on "most" scouting reports. That is 100% false.
For the record, I never said Rodgers was going to be a better QB than Jason Campbell. (I'm not exactly sure why I should care which one turns out better. Last I checked we didn't draft either one of them and had 2 chances at each.) If you choose to believe I think that without asking me, be my guest.
I simply called you on the inaccuracies of your post. There were a lot of them and you apparently can't refute them. I'm not shocked.
If you call me out into the street for a gunfight, don't bring a water pistol.
. Rodgers was widely considered the best qb in the draft. ANd the Commanders are notorious for subjective reporting. Remember, they just inovatted their offense with the shotgun formation.
