CATCH17
1st Round Pick
- Messages
- 69,514
- Reaction score
- 91,046
Hoofbite;4501347 said:JPP and Aldon Smith looked pretty damn good last year.
And he was going to be our pick last year before the 9ers got him.
Hoofbite;4501347 said:JPP and Aldon Smith looked pretty damn good last year.
burmafrd;4501288 said:It has occurred to me that finding great Pass Rushers is harder then finding great QBs.
KJJ;4502033 said:Suggs could have been a Cowboy instead of Newman there was a big debate on who the Cowboys were going to take in the 03 draft it was between Suggs and Newman. Reports were the Cowboys were considering trading down a few spots from #5 and selecting Suggs. Suggs went at #10 the Cowboys could have picked up an extra pick by trading down to grab him. He turned out to be a better player and is still playing at a high level.
CATCH17;4502080 said:And he was going to be our pick last year before the 9ers got him.
What reports? Parcells mentioned the three players we were looking at, and Suggs wasn't one of them.KJJ;4502033 said:Suggs could have been a Cowboy instead of Newman there was a big debate on who the Cowboys were going to take in the 03 draft it was between Suggs and Newman. Reports were the Cowboys were considering trading down a few spots from #5 and selecting Suggs.
Chocolate Lab;4502159 said:What reports? Parcells mentioned the three players we were looking at, and Suggs wasn't one of them.
Yahtzee!Nation;4501436 said:I think this is more the case of a QB/offense bias in the Hall than it is a lack of great pass rushers in the league.
Apollo Creed;4502103 said:Hindsight, hindsight.
And had we taken Suggs, we probably wouldn't have taken Ware in 05. Bill would've taken Spears or Derrick Johnson with our first pick and probably Matt Jones or Mark Clayton with our 2nd 1st round pick, ugh - with Aaron Rodgers still on the board.
See, it works both ways.
KJJ;4502215 said:Thought you were going to put me on ignore?Not necessarily if you have an opportunity to add another great pass rusher next to another to give yourself bookend pass rushers you go for it. If you look at the current Cowboys defense one of the big problems is Ware is our only effective pass rusher. The Cowboys gave up a 3rd and a 5th to move back into the first rd in 07 to grab Spencer to replace an aging Greg Ellis. Spencer has never provided the pass rush opposite Ware the Cowboys were hoping for. Suggs put up 12 sacks his rookie year in Baltimore and 10.5 in 04. He was playing for a Ravens defense that's been consistently solid for years and was playing next to a younger Ray Lewis. Although the Cowboys D was ranked high in 03 it slipped to #16 in 04 so it was highly unlikely Suggs would have reach the sack totals he did in 03 and 04 playing on the Cowboys D.
The Cowboys still would have needed another solid pass rusher and with 2 #1's in 05 I still think Ware would have been the pick at #11. Ware was rated ahead of Derrick Johnson by almost everyone Johnson went at #15. As for Mark Clayton he went at #22 so none of those players including Spears who the Cowboys took at #20 were rated as high as Ware. Suggs not having a Ray Lewis next to him wouldn't have made enough of an impact on the Cowboys pass rush in 03 and 04 for the team to pass on Ware in 05. The Ravens put 47 sacks in 03 compared to 32 for the Cowboys.
Apollo Creed;4502166 said:Lol.
I love how confidently he just makes things up as common knowledge. Kids fastly become 'that guy' around the forum. He's got the spirit of Nors, with the insight of Bob Sacamano.
KJJ;4502227 said:I wasn't making up anything some in the Dallas media were reporting that Suggs was one of the players the Cowboys were interested in. The team needed a corner and a pass rusher. If you have issues with me stop reading my posts and put me on ignore like you said you were going to do a few days ago.![]()
Apollo Creed;4502166 said:Lol.
I love how confidently he just makes things up as common knowledge.
Chocolate Lab;4502159 said:What reports? Parcells mentioned the three players we were looking at, and Suggs wasn't one of them.
KJJ;4502215 said:Thought you were going to put me on ignore?Not necessarily if you have an opportunity to add another great pass rusher next to another to give yourself bookend pass rushers you go for it. If you look at the current Cowboys defense one of the big problems is Ware is our only effective pass rusher. The Cowboys gave up a 3rd and a 5th to move back into the first rd in 07 to grab Spencer to replace an aging Greg Ellis. Spencer has never provided the pass rush opposite Ware the Cowboys were hoping for. Suggs put up 12 sacks his rookie year in Baltimore and 10.5 in 04. He was playing for a Ravens defense that's been consistently solid for years and was playing next to a younger Ray Lewis. Although the Cowboys D was ranked high in 03 it slipped to #16 in 04 so it was highly unlikely Suggs would have reach the sack totals he did in 03 and 04 playing on the Cowboys D.
The Cowboys still would have needed another solid pass rusher and with 2 #1's in 05 I still think Ware would have been the pick at #11. Ware was rated ahead of Derrick Johnson by almost everyone Johnson went at #15. As for Mark Clayton he went at #22 so none of those players including Spears who the Cowboys took at #20 were rated as high as Ware. Suggs not having a Ray Lewis next to him wouldn't have made enough of an impact on the Cowboys pass rush in 03 and 04 for the team to pass on Ware in 05. The Ravens put 47 sacks in 03 compared to 32 for the Cowboys.
JoeyBoy718;4501651 said:I think the OP's point was to point out to people how rare it is to find a consistent superstar pass rusher. We have a player in Ware who never misses games and consistently is at or near the top of the league in sacks, and will possibly go down as the greatest sack artist of all-time. Outside of Ware and Allen, there is no one currently in the league as consistently dominant. People expect to have a defense full of Hall of Fame pass rushers.
Apollo Creed;4502245 said:What in God's name did you just try to say?
And I'm still able to entertain myself every now and then by clicking on 'view post'. It's like a train wreck, ya can't help but watch the debacle ensue.
Can you provide any proof that the Cowboys were interested in Terrell Suggs?
That's right, you can't, just like you can't expect to talk game with the big boys spouting off unintelligibly like you do on a regular basis. Right back to where you belong, I'm a man of my word.
burmafrd;4502230 said:and as it turned out the Media as usual was wrong.
