5Stars;2678249 said:If TO had trouble catching a warm football, wait untill he tries to catch a frozen football in a whitout snowstorm!!
CrazyMonster;2678233 said:A QB that doesnt turn it over very much is more like it.
A very good RB when he is on the field too in Lynch.
Buffalo QBs threw 14 TDs and 15 INTs and the Bills gave away 15 Fumbles.CrazyMonster;2678233 said:A QB that doesnt turn it over very much is more like it.
A very good RB when he is on the field too in Lynch.
Hostile;2678257 said:Buffalo QBs threw 14 TDs and 15 INTs and the Bills gave away 15 Fumbles.
Meanwhile Romo had 26 TDs and 14 INTs and the Cowboys gave away 13 Fumbles.
Sorry to shoot the theory down in flames. Well, not really.
Hostile;2678257 said:Buffalo QBs threw 14 TDs and 15 INTs and the Bills gave away 15 Fumbles.
Meanwhile Romo had 26 TDs and 14 INTs and the Cowboys gave away 13 Fumbles.
Sorry to shoot the theory down in flames. Well, not really.
5Stars;2678172 said:OMG!
You mean Buffalo is finally going to win the SB?!!!
That's a stupid question. Without TO there would have been another WR on the field.Bleu Star;2678261 said:So without TO's 10 or so TDs Tony's numbers would have looked like Trent's?
Hostile;2678273 said:That's a stupid question. Without TO there would have been another WR on the field.
Torn_ACL;2678270 said:1 year $6 million.
Per the Ticket.
It could have been spread out any number of ways.... Witten, Austin, Hurd, Crayton, bennet, MB3, etc. etc.Bleu Star;2678280 said:One that would have produced at TO's level? That's eternally debatable. Austin surely wasn't catching 10. Crayton? Hurd?
It doesn't have to be one guy. You act like he is irreplaceable. He isn't. Too damned bad.Bleu Star;2678280 said:One that would have produced at TO's level? That's eternally debatable. Austin surely wasn't catching 10. Crayton? Hurd?