How about we start disguising our defensive scheme's

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
a little bit?

If we could do "some" of this we have a great chance at helping Rex fall flat.


It seems that when we line up on defense that teams have the perfect protection against us.

My question is: Do we disquise enough? at all? or should we even bother?
 
I think that those three missing starters have a lot to do with it.
 
YoMick;1661286 said:
a little bit?

If we could do "some" of this we have a great chance at helping Rex fall flat.


It seems that when we line up on defense that teams have the perfect protection against us.

My question is: Do we disquise enough? at all? or should we even bother?

our blitz disguising looks ugly its so predictable
 
If we disguise our schemes our own guys might not recognize them.

You didn't consider that did you?
 
YoMick;1661286 said:
a little bit?

If we could do "some" of this we have a great chance at helping Rex fall flat.


It seems that when we line up on defense that teams have the perfect protection against us.

My question is: Do we disquise enough? at all? or should we even bother?
We only bring 1 extra guy most of the time, so if they are going to max protect or keep help in, can't do much against that.
 
How about we start disguising our defensive scheme's

No kidding, right?


What the hell is Wade Phillips thinking?! THat dude don't know NOTHIN' 'bout defense!
 
YoMick;1661286 said:
It seems that when we line up on defense that teams have the perfect protection against us.

Miami had decent protection because they had two guys in the backfield on almost every single pass, giving them seven people available (if needed) to block four or five rushers.
 
AdamJT13;1661327 said:
Miami had decent protection because they had two guys in the backfield on almost every single pass, giving them seven people available (if needed) to block four or five rushers.

As did the Giants.
 
As do the Cowboys. Neither of the two teams have overloaded our protections. The two times the Giants rushed 6, Dallas had 6 in protection. The one time Miami rushed 7, Dallas had 7 in protection.
 
Rack;1661305 said:
No kidding, right?


What the hell is Wade Phillips thinking?! THat dude don't know NOTHIN' 'bout defense!

I wasnt calling out Wade... I was looking for some thoughts from the posters on here that know about this defensive "stuff"

Have a Coke and smile and... :p:
 
Hostile;1661302 said:
If we disguise our schemes our own guys might not recognize them.

You didn't consider that did you?

Kinda funny you mention that. A couple of times I didn't know if they were standing around because they were lost or trying to disguise.
 
Rack;1661305 said:
No kidding, right?


What the hell is Wade Phillips thinking?! THat dude don't know NOTHIN' 'bout defense!

Dude, you had to know it was coming. :D
 
YoMick;1661286 said:
a little bit?

If we could do "some" of this we have a great chance at helping Rex fall flat.


It seems that when we line up on defense that teams have the perfect protection against us.

My question is: Do we disquise enough? at all? or should we even bother?

At least a decade has passed since the Cowboys have had a defensive coordinator who truly cared about disguising his blitzes. It will likely take some time before the team grasps the techniques and intricacies of masking its rushers.
 
ScipioCowboy;1661470 said:
At least a decade has passed since the Cowboys have had a defensive coordinator that truly cared about disguising his blitzes. It will likely take some time before the team grasps the techniques and intricacies of masking its rushers.


Man... I gotta tell ya... watching New England do it... it is just sweet... cant wait to get there
 
YoMick;1661472 said:
Man... I gotta tell ya... watching New England do it... it is just sweet... cant wait to get there

I hope they do. And although I said a decade had passed, I'm not entirely certain of the time frame. It was clear Zimmer didn't give a plug nickel about disguising his blitzes, and if he did, he certainly didn't spend any substantial length of time teaching it.

Personally, I think this tendency may have carried over from Campo's years as coordinator. Dallas' sack total declined shortly after Campo took over.

Wade may have to undo twelve years worth of bad teaching.:eek:
 
hairic;1661342 said:
As do the Cowboys. Neither of the two teams have overloaded our protections. The two times the Giants rushed 6, Dallas had 6 in protection. The one time Miami rushed 7, Dallas had 7 in protection.

seriously?
 
SupermanXx;1661481 said:
seriously?

Indubitably. Each team did it when they were ahead. Though Miami only did it on 1st and goal from the 1 so they may have been rushing that many against the run.

Romo is 2/3 for 24 yards and 1 TD against it with the completions going to TEs.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,944
Messages
13,906,350
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top