Bleu Star
Bye Felicia!
- Messages
- 33,925
- Reaction score
- 19,920
Its misleading to base stats on MacFadden vs. Murray just to justify a season thats tanking.
First of all We could have still had MacFadden if we signed Murray and could have used MacFadden as our change of pace back. He may have ran for a a few hundred yards for than Murray has this juncture, but he is quickly running out of steam. Murray + MacFadden would have been a very lethal combo.
Secondly, I don't believe we would be in a losing predicament if we had signed Murray. Murray would have been in their to block on first down when Romo got injured. Thus our season would probably had been more successful if Romo didn't get hurt and we probably leading the division by now.
All this crap about McFadden is better than Murray or that its the injury to Romo thats caused our season to tank is nothing more than being in denial.
The fault lies in the FO in letting Murray go without a suitable replacement. Then thinking they can make do with and RBBC system that we've tried before and failed.
Randle gets injured and we go back to our one back system using McFadden and voila! our run game is back to where it was just like last year. Which goes to show you the FO messed up - letting Murray go without a replacement - and going with an RBBC that crippled our run game for almost half the season.
Brick walls don't comprehend. Fact.