TruBlueCowboy
New Member
- Messages
- 7,301
- Reaction score
- 0
Looking at some of the HOFers who are eligible this year, I have a feeling this is what will happen. Super Bowl QBs always get all the love.
My point is how can you not induct the one guy probably most responsible for Aikman's stats and wins? We had one of the best olines in NFL history, and Aikman looked like a crash test dummy in later years when it broke down, but I would say that benefited Emmitt more than Aikman. Novacek was a great tight end, and Mr. Reliable for Aikman when no one else was open, but nowhere near as good as Witten, Gonzalez and some of the best TEs today. Emmitt is the all-time leading rusher, but the Cowboys always used the pass to set up the run, and you can't tell me someone else couldn't have gotten 1,000 yards behind that oline. Emmitt allowed Aikman to sit back and do nothing in the second half, but I still don't think he was as vital as Irvin.
Michael Irvin once said in a TV interview that if you blindfolded both him and Aikman, they would still complete 90% of their passes because that's how well they knew each other. That timing-based offense depended on a guy like Irvin. Irvin was a Keyshawn with more speed. He could outmuscle anyone and always get relatively open for Aikman. He had hands of glue. Irvin was THE threat in the passing game. Defenses would put two, sometimes three men on him trying to take him out of the game. They didn't respect anyone else as much as they did Irvin.
Sorry fellas, I could see Aikman getting by without Emmitt, maybe some of those olinemen missing, maybe a lesser TE, but no way in hell Aikman does anything without Michael Irvin as his main man to move the chains. The biggest argument for Aikman stat-wise are his accuracy numbers and Aikman never goes above 60% each season if Irvin is missing.
My point is how can you not induct the one guy probably most responsible for Aikman's stats and wins? We had one of the best olines in NFL history, and Aikman looked like a crash test dummy in later years when it broke down, but I would say that benefited Emmitt more than Aikman. Novacek was a great tight end, and Mr. Reliable for Aikman when no one else was open, but nowhere near as good as Witten, Gonzalez and some of the best TEs today. Emmitt is the all-time leading rusher, but the Cowboys always used the pass to set up the run, and you can't tell me someone else couldn't have gotten 1,000 yards behind that oline. Emmitt allowed Aikman to sit back and do nothing in the second half, but I still don't think he was as vital as Irvin.
Michael Irvin once said in a TV interview that if you blindfolded both him and Aikman, they would still complete 90% of their passes because that's how well they knew each other. That timing-based offense depended on a guy like Irvin. Irvin was a Keyshawn with more speed. He could outmuscle anyone and always get relatively open for Aikman. He had hands of glue. Irvin was THE threat in the passing game. Defenses would put two, sometimes three men on him trying to take him out of the game. They didn't respect anyone else as much as they did Irvin.
Sorry fellas, I could see Aikman getting by without Emmitt, maybe some of those olinemen missing, maybe a lesser TE, but no way in hell Aikman does anything without Michael Irvin as his main man to move the chains. The biggest argument for Aikman stat-wise are his accuracy numbers and Aikman never goes above 60% each season if Irvin is missing.