It's already been said, but zone. Covering those patterns is supposed to be a strength of the cover 2. It was created to stop those short west coast style plays.
Assuming we are playing Tampa 2, yes, the corners have responsibilities in the flat. The problem is that we didn't play much Tampa 2 last year. I missed the first part of the game, so I have no idea what we were running when Woodhead as in.
Do you mean last year, or last night? Because the first half of the season last year we played Tampa-2 almost exclusively, until it was clear our CB's sucked at it.
lolTake Bruce Carter out?
Exactly. And everyone is swearing we're going to play even more man coverage this year. So that coverage is going to be on a LB or a safety.Last year. We didn't play much Tampa 2 last year.
I'm eager to see what all these arm chair D-Coordinators got to say.
It's simple in my opinion.
Somebody needs to go in there before he flares out and knock the mess out of him. Players like Woodhead and Sproles that make their money on plays like that are usually very small. While they are at the line of scrimmage acting like they are trying to block or even if they are flaring out into the flats, somebody needs to get to him early in the play and preferably early in the game and lay the wood on him.
I know it's easier said than done but that'll at the very least have the potential to rattle the player and the scheme from working as well as it has been.
Having a 290 lb dlineman chasing him or Sproles vs. Philly is not going to work. What is the issue?
I'm eager to see what all these arm chair D-Coordinators got to say.