Whatever man. I diametrically oppose any opinion that doesn't give credit where credit is due. Scandrick is balling out there in the defensive sets and on special teams. Yes. I asked for opinions but, as I would imagine you read, I have my own heavily tilted opinion on the subject as well. Don't call Scandrick a bum and expect for me to remain dormant.
But anyone who disagrees with you about Scandrick is suddenly a Jenkins fanboy?
The problem is you're arguing from emotion and opinion and bringing nothing else to the table. That's fine, but that doesn't prove or mean jack squat. You may as well open a chat room with yourself because you've created a forum completely closed off to any else's opinions, after you specifically asked for them.
Ive watched the coaches tape on every game. Particularly since Scandrick was moved outside, and he hasn't done much better, if at all than Claiborne in any aspect of the game. He is more often than not caught trailing on plays (hence my comments about his back being on TV so much.) He teeters between too much cushion and not enough. His technique is better than Claiborne's but the physical abilities needed to play out there, quick hips and the ability to turn and run, just aren't there. It's the exact reason he has never been a starter outside.
The only thing I have continued to say is that he needs to be moved back inside. Is that really so incredulous to you that you want to make this personal?
And FTR, I have never once said he stunk yesterday and have on many occasions in several different threads, said it was the best I had seen him play. So there goes that argument...
