AMERICAS_FAN
Active Member
- Messages
- 7,198
- Reaction score
- 0
He'll be a Hall of Famer
GloryDaysRBack;4546934 said:Most people seem to agree that Peterson is better but I don't think so
Peterson is definitely way more athletic and much more valuable as a return man
However, as a pure cover corner, I think Claiborne is significantly better..I think Peterson is more raw with more upside..but I think claiborne is definitely better when they both came out
Red Dragon;4546949 said:Worryingly, some things about Terence Newman apply to Claiborne, too.
Newman was taken #5 overall in the draft by Dallas; Claiborne was taken #6. Newman won the Jim Thorpe Award as the best defensive back in college football; so did Claiborne. How do we know Claiborne's going to be better than T-New?
newlander;4546847 said:Brass tacks: Mo reminds me of two guys: Mike Haynesworth and ROD Woodson. He's just as fluid, graceful and athletic as those two: yeah, they're hall of famers and I DO have that high of hopes for this kid. (I know I went old school on some of you, but do yourself a favor and youtube video of both if you are younger: YOU'LL see lots of similarities with claibornes' game)![]()
Red Dragon;4546949 said:Worryingly, some things about Terence Newman apply to Claiborne, too.
Newman was taken #5 overall in the draft by Dallas; Claiborne was taken #6. Newman won the Jim Thorpe Award as the best defensive back in college football; so did Claiborne. How do we know Claiborne's going to be better than T-New?
AMERICAS_FAN;4547056 said:He'll be a Hall of Famer
The30YardSlant;4547010 said:From 2003 to 2009 Newman was a top 5-10 corner if you average all those years together. A solid argument can be made that he was the best pure cover man in the league in 2005.
Chocolate Lab;4547223 said:To me, they really aren't alike at all. Newman was truly a tremendously explosive athlete -- his measurables pretty much blow Claiborne's away (as well as most others, even good corners). But Claiborne has better hands and probably better feel for the game.
Don't think he's like Bailey or Woodson (either Woodson), either, who were also rare athletes.
I think Claiborne is probably going to be more like a Mike Jenkins type, hopefully the 2009 version. Maybe Joe Haden.
CATCH17;4547300 said:He plays Corner like a receiver and he also tackles like he is a receiver.
perrykemp;4547308 said:
CATCH17;4547319 said:You can make all the faces you want but he is pathetic at tackling at times.
RastaRocket;4546840 said:I think he can definitely make some pro bowls. His superstar status will depend on his willingness to improve.
newlander;4546889 said:....every report I've read has said Mo is better and it isn't that close: talked to a few LSU fans online: they said the same: they preferred Mo.
CATCH17;4547319 said:..But im not worried. I was probably the 1st person on this board wanting him to be a Cowboy way back in early September.
