CFZ How impactful has Jason Peters been?

[Hardline]

NOT AS A FT Starter, please be realistic, just stop.. my plan is better, and DC already do it with Peters and should with 77 when he gets back. great insurance off the bench , injuries can and will happen. im not moving 73 in December just because 77 is back, he needs to be worked in slowly like peters.

ill let the coaches handle it.

LOL
You lay out a plan then say let the coaches handle it. What fivetwos said was the best way.

 

[LittleD]

Peters came in overweight and out of shape. Its taken time for the staff to get him up to playing shape. He is way over 30 so he's most
likely a valued backup at this point.

 

[fivetwos]

NOT AS A FT Starter, please be realistic, just stop.. my plan is better, and DC already do it with Peters and should with 77 when he gets back. great insurance off the bench , injuries can and will happen. im not moving 73 in December just because 77 is back, he needs to be worked in slowly like peters.

ill let the coaches handle it.

Well I’m fully aware that the coaches are going to decide this, as opposed to you and I in this space.

Why say things like “just stop?” Stop what?

Should we never discuss anything here? Close up shop maybe?

No need to be constantly confrontational.

 

[VaqueroTD]

Answer: About what you would expect for a 40-year old OT. LOL

From everything being reported by the coaches and media, appears to be almost a backup Oline coach and I think we can give him some credit for the early season turnaround on a unit that definitely had everyone worried.

 

[blueblood70]

Well I’m fully aware that the coaches are going to decide this, as opposed to you and I in this space.

Why say things like “just stop?” Stop what?

Should we never discuss anything here? Close up shop maybe?

No need to be constantly confrontational.

stop pushing the fact you believe both these guys are still playing ta at their peak HOF type number,.,. both are best to be depth and backups at this point. names dont make payers, their stions and where they are in their careers are al i need to know to decide to NOT move a rookie LT who's paying well and will be 13-15 games into being there all year and push him to LG,

sorry thats a double move and don't like it.. all but LG has been the same ALL YEAR and its working. you simply don't start making changes like that to a group that is best to gel and be cohesive, no NEED to do that,.,

I see an opportunity if we are in big game and day Steele or Tyler is struggling badly and we need a change, sure. That not really happened, Sure, they've got beat here and there, who doesn't but both have played well above their expectations, are healthy and by now in a groove. dont mess with a groove..

 

[fivetwos]

stop pushing the fact you believe both these guys are still playing ta at their peak HOF type number,.,. both are best to be depth and backups at this point. names dont make payers, their stions and where they are in their careers are al i need to know to decide to NOT move a rookie LT who's paying well and will be 13-15 games into being there all year and push him to LG,

sorry thats a double move and don't like it.. all but LG has been the same ALL YEAR and its working. you simply don't start making changes like that to a group that is best to gel and be cohesive, no NEED to do that,.,

I see an opportunity if we are in big game and day Steele or Tyler is struggling badly and we need a change, sure. That not really happened, Sure, they've got beat here and there, who doesn't but both have played well above their expectations, are healthy and by now in a groove. dont mess with a groove..

That’s your opinion and a very fair way to look at it.

Cohesion/consistency isn’t something you want to mess with, but there’s also a flip side that makes sense.

Very debatable topic, and why forums like this one exist.

Not everything has to be an argument. Agree to disagree is a real thing.

I also did not say that either one is at peak of their career performance wise, but an aging Tyron or Peters can still play at a level higher than many.