CowboyBlog;1124910 said:
I disagree. If we lose 5 or 6 in a row, it would be worse for the team and the franchise to keep him out there. We would actually be hurting our psychology for next year. Good young players would mentally become average young players.
Parcells was happy enough to admit his mistake and pull Bledsoe in the middle of a big game on national television. If Romo doesn't win a game by thanksgiving, the same people that were holding up signs in the stadium for Romo will be holding up Bledsoe signs. Or more likely, "Parcells has to go" signs. If Romo doesn't win a game, the taboo message wouldn't even need to be said.
We dont know if he is going to be the poster boy for Bad Qbs or not. We just dont know enough about him. Fact is that he could go winless this year and play good next year. Even if that happens, it would be to late.
Non of this really makes sense. We all admit that he might suck. Hostile has little confidence in him. I have little confidence, but don't think he will be awful. I think he might have something, but I have no idea. His three picks were awful.
The point is - he is out there because the guy before him has sucked, or been no better than average, for 6 straight games, more going into last season. You lose your job when you don't play well - period. Bledsoe played too many games too long.
Romo is in there with the hopes that he is better. Other than the three INTs, he already showed some better things. We'll see if he can cut the mistakes. But if he can't and shows that he has no ability, then all we know is that we don't have a single good QB on the roster.
But until he starts throwing 3 picks consistently every game and taking 6 sacks a game, I see no reason to go back to the other guy. None.