And on the converse would not having any rings preclude any coach from winning one?
I am not going to defend Garrett. I'm reacting more to the fact that about 90% of the people come on here with no other purpose than to blame and condemn and it's not like there is a whole lot of thought going into it. Thus me commenting on Garrett's trophy case not being empty. I didn't make the argument youre trying to saddle me with.
Again I'm not saddling you with anything.
I don't know, nor care, what your thoughts on Garrett are. Let alone what your thoughts on his trophy case are.
The fact that you can't comprehend that is also not my issue.
You came in assuming I was taking his rings away. Which I never did, or said.
You then claimed that I was commenting on his trophy case, or lack there of. Which I was not.
My only point the whole time was that having those rings did not qualify him as the HC. You made whatever assumptions you chose to off that and then some how got it in your massively over driven ego that my comments were about your personal feelings on Jason Garrett or his damn trophy case.
It's really as simple as that. I don't know how to make that any more clear than I already have. But you're going to continue to think that what I, or others say, has anything to do with your personal thoughts when there isn't anyone on these forums, except yourself, who ever stops to wonder what your thought on any subject is.
Edit: BTW to answer your question not having does not mean he won't ever win. Without question he could one day win as an HC.
I just don't think it's going to be in Dallas, if it even happens, unless Jones decides he's going to keep him around for a decade or more as the HC while he learns to be an HC.
