CTcowboy203
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,326
- Reaction score
- 4,196
We didn’t need splash signings but middle priced linebackers, dt’s would have sufficed
A little known historical fact is that Julius Caesar was a bully. And a little uptight.How many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!
And out of those 30... 3 have been correct. The Rams, Eagles, and Bucs.About 30 NFL teams disagree with you.
I agree that day 1 FA sigings have a low success rate and are typically overpaid, but I would also say the last 10+ years of cheap FA signings by the Cowboys haven't benefited them much at all.How many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!
You see a team keeping up with the niners? That’s the reality of the situation. Championship caliber teams are making real moves while some think the penny pinching and usual approach will get different results this time around. The holes are adding up and the minimum wage fillers aren’t getting it done. Didn’t work last year or the year before that and will be even worse this year!How many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!
start naming off all of those teams that have been right? Ill give you Iggles, Rams and Bucs..... who else?right
it is literaly every single other team that is stupid and wrong for making their team better in free agency
cowboys are the only smart team right right
They literally spent almost $200M this offseason alreadyAnd out of those 30... 3 have been correct. The Rams, Eagles, and Bucs.
How many FA signings have the Chiefs had?
That you Stephen? You suckHow many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!
Drue TranquilAnd out of those 30... 3 have been correct. The Rams, Eagles, and Bucs.
How many FA signings have the Chiefs had?
Not overreacting at all.How many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!
Just glad someone got it… gotta laugh.I’m not usually a grammar n azi, but this is funny.
I'll just assume sarcasm and not lack of football knowledge...How many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!
Patience.Nah man. After the playoff loss it's clear the defense needs depth and quality at certain positions.
It would not have been much to at least attempt to fill some holes while not crippling the future. No one was expecting Chris Jones or Patrick Queen.
Restructuring contracts to sign a Lavonte David type LB and a solid $8M a year big DT and leave the offense as is with a draft RB.....at least you could have squinted and said "ok that is a legit attempt to get better"
This is pretty pathetic.
LOL.How many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!
Not @RockportHow many of you are shamelessly overreacting to the lack of Cowboys participation in FA so far? You do realize that big splash signings have an extremely low success rate, right? Save your fake outrage for another day!