plymkr
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,385
- Reaction score
- 15,495
Right. It really makes me angry. The hypocrisy. I agree with you and Mannix on this. It sucks.Any team can do their own version of the Lambeau Leap, with no repercussions.
Right. It really makes me angry. The hypocrisy. I agree with you and Mannix on this. It sucks.Any team can do their own version of the Lambeau Leap, with no repercussions.
No, I don't think you agree with both of us. lol I was saying that it's legal for every team to do a version of the Lambeau Leap. There's no hypocrisy in that. Now, if you want to argue "preferential treatment", because the celebration they made famous is one of the ones allowed, I could maybe get on board with that.Right. It really makes me angry. The hypocrisy. I agree with you and Mannix on this. It sucks.
hope we get 10...just cause it was worth itI was thinking this yesterday. Lol
No he can't. And technically no player can pay another player's fines. However the league has no control over guys Venmo'ing one another so I think it will be fine.Don’t think he can
I’m sure Dak will take care of it. It’s too risky for Jerry. Remember when a coach got in trouble for a bottle of wine? Can’t remember which coach but he gave a player a bottle of wine and that was a cap violation lolNo he can't. And technically no player can pay another player's fines. However the league has no control over guys Venmo'ing one another so I think it will be fine.
Who cares?I think about half the team was involved in celebrations in the Salvation Army pot today.
Goodell does not like the Cowboys?With Goodell at the helm, he is probably leaning towards suspending some of our players. Guarantee the topic is being discussed at his office this morning. They will pull some new rule out of Goodell’s *** and suspend half our offense. Zeke gets 6 games just for good measure.