jr40usa;1978161 said:None! The Giants won the SB with team chemistry. Too many superstars will divide the team.
Doesn't make sense to tie all that money in WRs. We need to focus on the draft.
Let the Patroits keep Moss.
theogt;1978181 said:The Giants got to the Super Bowl and won it by having a few breaks go their way. I'd rather get there winning by 20 points in every game along the way.
gazmc_06;1978182 said:Burress is a beast....he is a top 5 reciever.
gazmc_06;1978203 said:Owens, Moss, Chad, Burress, Fitzgerald.
gazmc_06;1978211 said:Burress is better than all of them IMO, he played injured all year and still put up great numbers....and won the superbowl.
gazmc_06;1978221 said:Burress isn't very good? lol...he played hurt all year and finished with over 1000 yards and 10+ TD's, made great catches in big games including the catch that won the superbowl - the guy is a top reciever.
gazmc_06;1978203 said:Owens, Moss, Chad, Burress, Fitzgerald.
jr40usa;1978161 said:None! The Giants won the SB with team chemistry. Too many superstars will divide the team.
Doesn't make sense to tie all that money in WRs. We need to focus on the draft.
Let the Patroits keep Moss.
gazmc_06;1978231 said:I have him high up there, nothing will change that. He made big plays for the Giants and he done it with a QB that I still don't consider all that great.
gazmc_06;1978231 said:I have him high up there, nothing will change that. He made big plays for the Giants and he done it with a QB that I still don't consider all that great.