How silly was all that scoreboard talk?

burmafrd;3104231 said:
does not prove a thing. If they had moved it someone would have talked by now, so frankly I call BS on the moving part.


ok. Your right they havent said it officialy. But honestly its not really anything to argue about. No one will hit it either way.
 
burmafrd;3104231 said:
does not prove a thing. If they had moved it someone would have talked by now, so frankly I call BS on the moving part.

You're right. 1st hand accounts from multiple respectable posters doesn't count for ****.
 
Hoofbite;3104282 said:
You're right. 1st hand accounts from multiple respectable posters doesn't count for ****.
:lmao2:

I actually saw some photos that showed the difference. It's slightly higher now.
 
I was totally and completely wrong that it could be hit. The backup punter from Tennessee tried to hit it and did.

I must continue to repent for my errant belief that it could not be done so that it satisfies one poster here.

It continues to not be a factor in an actual game. Maybe if the Eagles are out of the hunt in that last game their guy will try it in an actual game. I think anyone who does is a complete fool, but A.J. Trepasso proved me wrong. I can never forget that.
 
Videoboardgate goes on the scrap heap of history along with:

-- 44-6 is an indication of how this team will play all year
-- This offense can't survive without T.O.
-- Brooking is broken down and can't play anymore
-- Newman can't and never will stay healthy
-- Scandrick >>> Jenkins and Jenkins is only playing because he was the first rounder
-- Spencer is a bust and can't play

etc.
 
dfense;3104676 said:
He was trying in warmups and couldn't do it.


not sure who told you that, but I have pictures of him doing it.

He hit it once, and I think it was intentional...it was right after talking to joe decamillis and they both were pointing up at it.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,143
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top