percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
"There are none so blind as those who will not see."Their own eyes are blinded by their fandom.
"There are none so blind as those who will not see."Their own eyes are blinded by their fandom.
You and a few others are too preoccupied with what the rulebook says.
I haven’t “quoted” any rules you and the others have.
You're avoiding my question.
At this point, I'd like you to ask yourself why you don't want to look at the play and analyze it critically.
Who should everyone believe everyone in Cowboys Nation?
I'm curious as to why you can't repeat it.I’ve answered that question in the past.
I don't think this is a Cowboys Nation thing. This is going on all over the NFL, every team, every fan base.
What’s been going on here for the past three years is certainly a Cowboys Nation thing. Can’t imagine other fan bases arguing this topic like we have since 2014. Granted not many other fan bases have been as affected by the rule as ours but at some point you have to let it go and move on. What’s happening here is the sad state of this franchise. We’re not winning consistently and fans are frustrated. When fans are frustrated they look for excuses and things to complain about. Every offseason this topic comes up and it gets heated.
When Mike Pereira himself says it's time to go back to the football move, you know it's reached critical mass. This is a guy who payed a role in interpreting the "going to the ground" rule (wrongly, as he now admits), and who supported Blandino's overturn of both the Dez and James catches. (Again, wrongly, as he now admits.)I don't think this is a Cowboys Nation thing. This is going on all over the NFL, every team, every fan base. The Commissioner of the sport is saying that the Catch Rule is a mistake and needs to be fixed.
I'm curious as to why you can't repeat it.
When Mike Pereira himself says it's time to go back to the football move, you know it's reached critical mass. This is a guy who payed a role in interpreting the "going to the ground" rule (wrongly, as he now admits), and who supported Blandino's overturn of both the Dez and James catches. (Again, wrongly, as he now admits.)
The commissioner knew there was a big problem in 2015, which is why he appointed the catch committee to clarify and streamline the catch rule. They did manage to get specific examples of the football move into the rule book, but failed to get rid of the "upright long enough" standard for becoming a runner.
It's politics that has kept "upright long enough" in the rule book for three seasons now. Even though the catch committee spelled out specific examples of what a football move was (tucking the ball, turning upfield, taking additional steps), that has been largely ignored by replay officials, who have followed the "upright long enough" standard which was instituted in 2015.Yeah, we don't agree here, at all. I can go to any fan base message board and see the exact same discussions going on, when there is any questionable catch call. We are not unique, not matter how much you would like to believe that we are. We are not even as bad as many fan bases, to be honest.
Yeah, we don't agree here, at all. I can go to any fan base message board and see the exact same discussions going on, when there is any questionable catch call. We are not unique, not matter how much you would like to believe that we are. We are not even as bad as many fan bases, to be honest.
You sure are saying a lot for someone who doesn't want to say any more. If you're going to take the time to post about how you don't want to take the time to repeat what you saw that convinced you Dez didn't complete the catch process before hitting the ground, you could easily take the time to say it.I’ve told you several times in this thread that I’m not going to rehash the same arguments we’ve had. This has been going on for three years. Some don’t have the passion for this topic that you do. Once you see someone trying to move on you start asking questions to try and pull them back in. It’s your way of keeping this going. Appears MarcusRock has tired of it at least for the time being. If you want to keep arguing this go look him up and see if you can pull him back in. I’ve invested enough time in this thread.
It's politics that has kept "upright long enough" in the rule book for three seasons now. Even though the catch committee spelled out specific examples of what a football move was (tucking the ball, turning upfield, taking additional steps), that has been largely ignored by replay officials, who have followed the "upright long enough" standard which was instituted in 2015.
The only solution is to remove "upright long enough" and leave no doubt that the football move is what completes the catch process.
Yeah, they’re going on now after the Ertz play but can you locate as many threads as this one the past 3 years on other fan boards? No other fan base has been harping on this topic the past three years like this one. We still have fans crying about a play from three years ago. This topic has become an annual offseason event the past three years.
It's become more about making it easy for the PR guys who manage perception than about making it easy for the officials on the field.Honestly Percy, when I played the Official made a call and that was it. Right or wrong, that was all it was. I wished we could just go back to that but I know that's unrealistic. I agree, it needs to go back the way it was. Make it more clear cut, more simple to officiate.