silverbear said:
Aw shucks, it wasn't nuthin'... LOL...
I actually do find it gratifying that nobodies like me can contact a newspaper like that, and they'll act if they find the complaints have merit... mind you, I'm quite sure I'm not the ONLY one who contacted them about this...
Of course you're right, in this internet era, a rumor appears one place, and next thing you know, it's all over the place... and the more often it's repeated, the more it gains credibility...
Unfortunately, as a member of the media who works at a newspaper, I have to agree with you.
If writers don't have their own sources within a particular organization, they "borrow" from other publications - AP, Pro Football Weekly, Dallas Morning News (or whichever local paper covers a particular beat) - and that information gets circulated to other areas.
As an example, there was this controversy about Jerry Falwell saying that the Teletubbies were "gay." An AP reporter writes the story and then the story is carried around the country. Now, if you goggle or access the story, you will get statements about Falwell saying that the Teletubbies were gay.
But he never said that. The "statement" came from Falwell's publication - can't remember the name - and the article had to do with gay groups in Europe "identifying" the Teletubbies as "gay" characters. The original article, which I read, mentioned this fact as a way to inform parents.
The AP writer asked Falwell about the article, and Falwell said he stood by the article because he trusts the editor of his publication.
Boom: "Falwell says the Teletubbies are gay."
Now that's what most believe, and whenever this controversy gets mentioned that background information is what is inserted into stories.
Note: This is
NOT a discussion on Falwell and his beliefs. This was simply offered as a way information gets circulated as if it is the "truth" when it is not. I did my own research to verify what "actually" occurred.
P.S. Good job, Silverbear, calling for responsible journalism and bringing this to the attention of the paper's editor. Opinion is one thing. Errors that can be verified is another.
This case involves the latter.