I guess its time to start looking at Batch for the Stealers

JMead said:
MW = Clueless dimwit who likes the taste of Big Ben.

Dont always buy what the media is selling my clueless friend.


What's the matter?

Tired of talking about Losman's big numbers on the Buffalo board?

dork.gif
 
JustSayNotoTO said:
And yet you conviently gloss over your own 4 interception performance. Way to go.

If you think that go right ahead. It doesnt make Big Ben look any better.. Having a worse QB rating than someone who threw 4 INTs.
 
MichaelWinicki said:
What's the matter?

Tired of talking about Losman's big numbers on the Buffalo board?

dork.gif

I never liked Losman and I never will. Nall should have gotten the job.

According to you Losman is in the same league as Ben seeing as how he played against Maimi the same way Ben does every week. I guess if the Bills luck up and win the SB you will be slurping Losman down too?
 
JMead said:
I never liked Losman and I never will. Nall should have gotten the job.

According to you Losman is in the same league as Ben seeing as how he played against Maimi the same way Ben does every week. I guess if the Bills luck up and win the SB you will be slurping Losman down too?


You're funny!


In a "nim-rod" sorta way.


Next time I go to the Galleria I'll be looking for you in the food court.
 
speaking of nimrods, anyone think we could have gotten a 3rd rounder for Pettiti?

:lmao2:
 
Kilyin said:
speaking of nimrods, anyone think we could have gotten a 3rd rounder for Pettiti?

:lmao2:


Yes. :)

Actually if you had the magical power of being able to read you would have seen that my post said a 5th...
 
MichaelWinicki said:
Yes. :)

Actually if you had the magical power of being able to read you would have seen that my post said a 5th...

Hey man, you know I'm just giving you a hard time... but...

MichaelWinicki said:
If a team wasn't overly desperate for a tackle I think they would give up a 5th for the guy... if they're desperate maybe a 4th or even a dare I say it-- a 3rd.

:)
 
Kilyin said:
Hey man, you know I'm just giving you a hard time... but...



:)


Did you see that one little word in there-- "desperate"?


I never said a 4th or a 3rd were a gimmee-- never.


As a matter of fact one of your mods over mentioned a 4th.


So there. ;)
 
CanadianCowboysFan said:
The Steelers won in spite of his terrible play in that game and because the refs jobbed the Seabags big time.


Well there is certainly some truth to that.

But Ben achieved put up two QB ratings that Bledsoe has come close too. That means something.
 
JMead said:
If you think that go right ahead. It doesnt make Big Ben look any better.. Having a worse QB rating than someone who threw 4 INTs.

You are trying to compare a guy that had the worst QB rating in SB history with a guy that threw the most INT's in SB history. The difference is, one is a winner, one is a loser.

I wonder how many thank you cards Brady gets from Bledsoe a year for earning him the one Super Bowl ring he will ever get a chance to posess.
 
JMead said:
MW = Clueless dimwit who likes the taste of Big Ben.

Dont always buy what the media is selling my clueless friend.

Where's that ban hammer when you need it... anyone??

JMead ------->:hammer:

:bills::beatit:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
463,968
Messages
13,780,792
Members
23,770
Latest member
AnthonyDavis
Back
Top