I have a theory

Welp. Good turn out folks. I'd like to thank you for the honest cooperation.

Those that voted yes........BANNED!!!

Worked like a charm eh Fellas? (you know who you are)

BWAAHHHHAAAAAAAAAHHAAAAAHAAAAA.

Deep Breath..............

BWAAHHHHAAAAAAAAAHHAAAAAHAAAAA.
 
1.) I'm a young 67.

2.) Hell, no! I'm a man of great principle.

2A.) Hell yes! - if Jerry gives me some money - fortunately, my principles are easily compromised. :D
 
Ok so has anyone complied an average age for the Yes answers vs. the No answers.

I would also like to see a youngest and oldest voter in each catagory.

Quickdraw...you started this...it would seem to fall to you to compile the info.
 
42

No to TO, but I think it will happen and I'm trying to get used to it. I agree that the wheat case should be overturned.
 
47

Hell NO

I also do not understand any of the yes votes in this entire thread.
 
big dog cowboy said:
47

Hell NO

I also do not understand any of the yes votes in this entire thread.
Similarly we don't understand why someone would say no to a guy that would help the team.
 
theogt said:
Similarly we don't understand why someone would say no to a guy that would help the team.
That would be "help destroy the team" I think you mean.
 
JackMagist said:
That would be "help destroy the team" I think you mean.
No, that's certainly not what I mean. He hasn't destroyed a team yet. Can't think of a reason he would destroy our team.
 
JackMagist said:
That would be "help destroy the team" I think you mean.

That would be "help destroy the teams that we play against" I think you mean.

:D
 
theogt said:
Similarly we don't understand why someone would say no to a guy that would help the team.
That is certainly a subject to debate.

My question is....at what price? I'm not talking financially either.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,278
Messages
13,862,997
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top