Chuck 54
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,514
- Reaction score
- 12,529
Round 1.
Clearly the Cowboys were never considering a CB or WR. From all we've read and heard, Anthony Spencer was the guy all along, and they were ready to draft him at #22 until the final 1.5 minute mark when the Cleveland deal was made.
We all had the WR or CB we wanted, but if you trust Ireland, Wade, and JJ and stick to your draft board, you have to be happy that you got the exact guy you wanted 4 slots lower than expected and picked up Cleveland's first round pick in 2008 for your 3rd and 5th this year.
Spencer, whether he starts right away or not, is going to be a huge impact guy this year from all accounts. He's incredibly strong having done 30 reps, and he ran a 4.7 while Gaines Adams only ran 4.64...6/100's of a second isn't even a half step. He's a 3 year starter, and as a senior he recorded 93 tackles, 26.5 behind the line, 10.5 sacks, 5 forced fumbles, and had 6 pass breakups...those are incredible numbers for a DE, great numbers for a LB. He has forced quite a large number of fumbles every year. Spencer is going to be a beast.
Round 2
I'm not thrilled that we didn't get a WR here, but....if you weren't going to get one of the top 7-8 WR's, all the rest are really guys that are just like the ones you already have on the roster and not far from the guys you have later in the draft.
Round 3
I love the selection of James Martin, OT Boston College...6'7"...311, very fast at 5.08. We got a battle tested big time performer with tons of experience and durability. Martin started at both OT and OG, and was the 6th rated OT in the nation by most people...My guess is that he will end up as a swing guy in his first season.
Round 4
Isaiah Stanback....who? I'll tell you who. He's more talented, stronger, and more experienced than Patrick Crayton was. Stanback actually played QB and WR at WAshington. AT Washington, he played against fast and great defenses at UCLA and USC. STanback is an incredible runner with the ball in his hands. As a junior, he ran for 96 yards and a TD against Arizona. He was 14-18 for 201 and a TD passing against USC. He threw for 301 against CAl and 353 against Notre DAme. He had 350 yards rushing in 8 games this season on a sprained foot. AS a redshirt freshman, he played in all 11 games at WR for the Huskies, switching to Qb his sophomore year.
He comes out of college with more WR experience than most other QB's making the transition, like Crayton, and he brings big time football experience from the PAC that Crayton didn't have coming from a small school. AT 6'2.5" and 215, he ran a 4.55. This kid is an athlete.
I'm not trying to compare him to guys like Bowe or Meacham in round 1, but this guy makes sense for us where we are with Crayton 1 season from free agency...I'd look for STanback to possibly hold for kicks and be involved in the return game, something he did at Washington before becoming their only option at QB.
Doug Free... Another OT/OG...6'6.5", 320, and ran a 5.19!!! This guy can move. He was the LT on the line behind which the leading rusher in the nation ran. Maybe he's Flozell's replacement, maybe it's Martin, maybe it's McQ, but these athletic, big OT's are just the type of guys who become great OG's in the NFL if not starting at OT. Besides, now having 3 young OT's on the team makes it more likely that Leonard Davis will be able to remain at OG for a long, long time.
This draft hasn't been flashy...where's the WR and CB? Personally, I never thought we'd bring in another safety...just didn't make sense at this point. You'd be bringing in guys to try and take the position away from the guy you just drafted last year or the guy you just invested fairly good money in through free agency...you can't have all those safeties on your roster.
For those of us who've been moaning about the OL and the pass rush for the past 6 years or more, this is a great draft that will make us a better, deeper team at both positions. You can't make a committment to improving your pass rush and your OL without doing exactly what we did this draft, pass on the marginal WR's and CB's at the end of round 1 and in round 2.
It's not flashy, but I love this draft...having two #1's next year is a happy bonus that will give us a reason to follow the Browns... The Browns did what is best for their team, and they had a great draft for their long term future, which is the way successful teams do it. WE didn't "rape" them for the pick...the Browns did the smart thing for them, long term. They will be a better organization for having the top 3 guys they got by dealing with us.
The short term benefits us because those rookies aren't going to create lots of wins playing in the division with Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Cinncinnati...that's 5-6 losses right there. They'll see the benefits of this draft 2-3 years from now and will start to become a factor again, but we'll see the immediate benefits next draft...2008.
Clearly the Cowboys were never considering a CB or WR. From all we've read and heard, Anthony Spencer was the guy all along, and they were ready to draft him at #22 until the final 1.5 minute mark when the Cleveland deal was made.
We all had the WR or CB we wanted, but if you trust Ireland, Wade, and JJ and stick to your draft board, you have to be happy that you got the exact guy you wanted 4 slots lower than expected and picked up Cleveland's first round pick in 2008 for your 3rd and 5th this year.
Spencer, whether he starts right away or not, is going to be a huge impact guy this year from all accounts. He's incredibly strong having done 30 reps, and he ran a 4.7 while Gaines Adams only ran 4.64...6/100's of a second isn't even a half step. He's a 3 year starter, and as a senior he recorded 93 tackles, 26.5 behind the line, 10.5 sacks, 5 forced fumbles, and had 6 pass breakups...those are incredible numbers for a DE, great numbers for a LB. He has forced quite a large number of fumbles every year. Spencer is going to be a beast.
Round 2
I'm not thrilled that we didn't get a WR here, but....if you weren't going to get one of the top 7-8 WR's, all the rest are really guys that are just like the ones you already have on the roster and not far from the guys you have later in the draft.
Round 3
I love the selection of James Martin, OT Boston College...6'7"...311, very fast at 5.08. We got a battle tested big time performer with tons of experience and durability. Martin started at both OT and OG, and was the 6th rated OT in the nation by most people...My guess is that he will end up as a swing guy in his first season.
Round 4
Isaiah Stanback....who? I'll tell you who. He's more talented, stronger, and more experienced than Patrick Crayton was. Stanback actually played QB and WR at WAshington. AT Washington, he played against fast and great defenses at UCLA and USC. STanback is an incredible runner with the ball in his hands. As a junior, he ran for 96 yards and a TD against Arizona. He was 14-18 for 201 and a TD passing against USC. He threw for 301 against CAl and 353 against Notre DAme. He had 350 yards rushing in 8 games this season on a sprained foot. AS a redshirt freshman, he played in all 11 games at WR for the Huskies, switching to Qb his sophomore year.
He comes out of college with more WR experience than most other QB's making the transition, like Crayton, and he brings big time football experience from the PAC that Crayton didn't have coming from a small school. AT 6'2.5" and 215, he ran a 4.55. This kid is an athlete.
I'm not trying to compare him to guys like Bowe or Meacham in round 1, but this guy makes sense for us where we are with Crayton 1 season from free agency...I'd look for STanback to possibly hold for kicks and be involved in the return game, something he did at Washington before becoming their only option at QB.
Doug Free... Another OT/OG...6'6.5", 320, and ran a 5.19!!! This guy can move. He was the LT on the line behind which the leading rusher in the nation ran. Maybe he's Flozell's replacement, maybe it's Martin, maybe it's McQ, but these athletic, big OT's are just the type of guys who become great OG's in the NFL if not starting at OT. Besides, now having 3 young OT's on the team makes it more likely that Leonard Davis will be able to remain at OG for a long, long time.
This draft hasn't been flashy...where's the WR and CB? Personally, I never thought we'd bring in another safety...just didn't make sense at this point. You'd be bringing in guys to try and take the position away from the guy you just drafted last year or the guy you just invested fairly good money in through free agency...you can't have all those safeties on your roster.
For those of us who've been moaning about the OL and the pass rush for the past 6 years or more, this is a great draft that will make us a better, deeper team at both positions. You can't make a committment to improving your pass rush and your OL without doing exactly what we did this draft, pass on the marginal WR's and CB's at the end of round 1 and in round 2.
It's not flashy, but I love this draft...having two #1's next year is a happy bonus that will give us a reason to follow the Browns... The Browns did what is best for their team, and they had a great draft for their long term future, which is the way successful teams do it. WE didn't "rape" them for the pick...the Browns did the smart thing for them, long term. They will be a better organization for having the top 3 guys they got by dealing with us.
The short term benefits us because those rookies aren't going to create lots of wins playing in the division with Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Cinncinnati...that's 5-6 losses right there. They'll see the benefits of this draft 2-3 years from now and will start to become a factor again, but we'll see the immediate benefits next draft...2008.