TheCount
Pixel Pusher
- Messages
- 25,523
- Reaction score
- 8,849
Interestingly, I've never found Jeniffer Aniston to be nearly as hot as her reputation. She's definitely in great shape for someone in their mid 40's though.
...........for bashing at ugly Kim
http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6633503/sinead-oconnor-kim-kardashian-rolling-stone-cover
Yeah like Sinead O'Connor's not ugly. Kim on her worst day looks 100 times better than Sinead on her best day.
Odd coming from someone whos biggest hit was written by someone else.
Good music is still out there you just have to wade through a mountain of poop to get to it.
Yeah like Sinead O'Connor's not ugly. Kim on her worst day looks 100 times better than Sinead on her best day.
Sinead is damn near 50 now. When she was younger, she was definitely pretty - even with the shaved head. She looked a lot like Winona Ryder, or even Natalie Portman.
Kim Kardashian is an attention *****, and those who watch their crap are a bunch of suckers only making these idiots richer by the second.
Interestingly, I've never found Jeniffer Aniston to be nearly as hot as her reputation. She's definitely in great shape for someone in their mid 40's though.
I don't think at least this topic about Kim being on "RS" is about looks.
Sinead is damn near 50 now. When she was younger, she was definitely pretty - even with the shaved head. She looked a lot like Winona Ryder, or even Natalie Portman.
Well the op said 'for bashing ugly Kim' so I would say it is about her looks. There is no other way to look at it.
"Ugly" can be an internal quality.
Sinead O'Connor has never been pretty. Please.
I disagree.
If that's not pretty, you've must be dating super models.