I may be wrong...but D.Ware is the sack leader!!!

[cwalk]

I checked NFL.com and if Ware had 2 sacks today which I believe he did...he will be ahead of J. Allen by half a sack


Did he have 2 sacks today...NFL.com has him down for 1?


GO COWBOYS


Merriman had none:laugh2:

 

[Bob Sacamano]

he had 1

 

[Eddie]

They listed him with 2 sacks in the game telecast.

Did the fumble count as a sack?

 

[Royal Laegotti]

Funny what Merriman has become without roids, just average!:laugh2:

 

[eduncan22]

Ware was awesome.

At times, he can't be stopped.

 

[TheBigEasy]

I checked NFL.com and if Ware had 2 sacks today which I believe he did...he will be ahead of J. Allen by half a sack


Did he have 2 sacks today...NFL.com has him down for 1?


GO COWBOYS


Merriman had none:laugh2:

They took the sack away from him where the intentional grounding happened. Not sure why...I need the sack points for my fantasy team

 

[DBOY3141]

He had 1. The one he had on Campbell with the intentional grounding was not a sack.

 

[theogt]

He only had 1 sack, which puts him tied for 2nd.

 

[03EBZ06]

I thought he had two sacks as well but I think the one sack where Ware had Campbell wrapped up and while Campbell was going down, he threw the ball and got penalized for intentional grounding and that sack was taken away?

I'm not entirely sure, maybe some one can enlighten us.

 

[theogt]

I thought he had two sacks as well but I think the one sack where Ware had Campbell wrapped up and while Campbell was going down, he threw the ball and got penalized for intentional grounding and that sack was taken away?

I'm not entirely sure, maybe some one can enlighten us.

During the game they had that one listed as a sack, but NFL.com isn't listing it.

 

[Boyzmamacita]

A defensive player should not be penalized because the QB grounds the ball. If anything, it should be an automatic sack. He had him in the grasp, which is why he intentionally grounded it. Maybe the league will look into this.

 

[superpunk]

A defensive player should not be penalized because the QB grounds the ball. If anything, it should be an automatic sack. He had him in the grasp, which is why he intentionally grounded it. Maybe the league will look into this.

It's penalty, though - so it's a non-play. If they didn't accept the penalty, it would go down as an incompletion, not a sack. Same with pass interference, that doesn't count in a receiver's stats.