I Want To Believe In Dak

You don't care any way. Continue on complaining. Woo hoo! :popcorn: I know ... think up an insult and complain.:muttley:
What "insult"...what "complaint"? Talk about making things up and complaining.

Just wondered what the heck you are trying to say. It's no insult or complaint.
 
I have always believed in him. But I believe he is a great leader, the perfect face of your franchise, a QB who really learned his NFL craft on the field, and I believe he is an above average starter who can win a SB if the roster is good and balanced on offense and decent on defense.

If the defense is much improved vs the run and can actually stop the run when committing to it, and if the OL is improved, we have a decent run game, and he finally has multiple weapons on offense like most of the top teams, Then if he craps the bed, I’ll still respect him, but I’ll stop believing in him.
 
How about being right on target. Heel health medical denial and fix the problem just as in New Jersey needing air traffic handling the real issues. Not asking for covering up here. Support is the truth, not expecting others to be whimpering and bending knees. Protect the Cowboys and all you do is cry.

Dallas should not have been cheated. yet you cry non stop against. Be a winner for real. Quit crying instead.
I will not support a player I don't believe in.
 
I have always believed in him. But I believe he is a great leader, the perfect face of your franchise, a QB who really learned his NFL craft on the field, and I believe he is an above average starter who can win a SB if the roster is good and balanced on offense and decent on defense.

If the defense is much improved vs the run and can actually stop the run when committing to it, and if the OL is improved, we have a decent run game, and he finally has multiple weapons on offense like most of the top teams, Then if he craps the bed, I’ll still respect him, but I’ll stop believing in him.
A great leader doesn't encourage violence against referees
 
Prescott hasn't done anything in the post season with good rosters at his disposal to have any belief in him at this point. He was able to actually run a bit back then as well.
 
I believe. I believe Brock Purdy, two NFCCGs, one Super Bowl appearance, more than six years younger than Dak Prescott, signed for significantly less than Dak. Apparently Jerry he did not set the NFL quarterback compensation market after all.
 
I believe. I believe Brock Purdy, two NFCCGs, one Super Bowl appearance, more than six years younger than Dak Prescott, signed for significantly less than Dak. Apparently Jerry he did not set the NFL quarterback compensation market after all.
Well, yeah, you’re right. Most people knew Jerry was negotiating with just his agent, and not any competing team willing to offer Dak more money.
 
Well, yeah, you’re right. Most people knew Jerry was negotiating with just his agent, and not any competing team willing to offer Dak more money.
Hendrickson and Parsons may want to take note. Perhaps the pendulum is starting to swing back the other way. Teams have to spend a minimum on player compensation …but not all on just a select few.
 
I want to believe in more than Dak.......and that's the real narrative. The "tunnel vision" about this team's shortcomings is as believable as the sky being purple. Film don't lie.....SAS and the pundits do.
 
Hendrickson and Parsons may want to take note. Perhaps the pendulum is starting to swing back the other way. Teams have to spend a minimum on player compensation …but not all on just a select few.
I cant see Parsons taking less than being the highest paid edge in the league regardless of what he says in the media. Obviously this is why hes still not signed.

Had I had it my way we would have not resigned Dak at all, let him play out his final season which we now know was a disaster and his market value would have plummeted as a result. We could have got him on the cheap or moved on in pursuit of a better and younger QB.
 
I cant see Parsons taking less than being the highest paid edge in the league regardless of what he says in the media. Obviously this is why hes still not signed.

Had I had it my way we would have not resigned Dak at all, let him play out his final season which we now know was a disaster and his market value would have plummeted as a result. We could have got him on the cheap or moved on in pursuit of a better and younger QB.
Timing is important. While Dallas, Philadelphia, and Washington will all struggle to get double digit wins with their difficult schedules, San Francisco has a comparably easy one this season. They should roll and Purdy’s price tag may well have been in “Dak” territory.

Significant is a team didn’t just shrug and accept “that’s the market” like they couldn’t do anything about it. Star players and their agents can learn the hard way same as owners can.
 
But I just can't. Dak has obviously flashed some top shelf ability at times in his career but going on 9 years in the league all he really has accomplished are some humiliating bad performances in the few playoff appearances he's made. I won't get into the horrible contract extension he received here.

The worst part is he's been injury prone and obviously regressing from an ability standpoint. In his last 8 games he's 3-5 with a 45 QBR. My point is he was never enough and he's not getting better. So is Pickens better than Cooks, yea of course he is but is he that much better that he makes that kind of difference in Dak's play? Is Tyler Booker better than Zach Martin? The point I'm making is that I don't think you can make enough good moves on the offensive side that drastically changes the one thing that ultimately determines the outcome of games and that's Dak himself. I obviously hope I am wrong but I don't think I am.

As a Tennessee fan Milton ain't it either, more upside than Rush yes but he's a Temu Dak.
dak-prescott-realizing-something-6jnl6koe46okns53.gif
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,501
Messages
13,879,378
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top