cowboys#1;1085825 said:i hope drew has another bad game because if he has 400 yds and 5 tds we are going to hear how great he is.....:jerk: hopefully the defense will score all our points...
cowboys#1;1085825 said:i hope "the statue" has another bad game because if he has 400 yds and 5 tds we are going to hear how great he is.....:jerk: hopefully the defense will score all our points...
yeah its called an illusion, we beat the texans so what....parcells and his coaching along with bledsoe and his critical turnovers cant cover up the fact that we will go nowhere....ask the eaglesconner01;1085857 said:some people amaze me. you want our qb to have a bad game so you can fullfil your romo fantasy.what a dumb idea. maybe we should just loose the rest of our games so we get a good draft pick too.or maybe the team plane crashes so we can get some new players.
conner01;1085857 said:some people amaze me. you want our qb to have a bad game so you can fullfil your romo fantasy.what a dumb idea. maybe we should just loose the rest of our games so we get a good draft pick too.or maybe the team plane crashes so we can get some new players.
im cool with everything except the plane crash ideaconner01;1085857 said:some people amaze me. you want our qb to have a bad game so you can fullfil your romo fantasy.what a dumb idea. maybe we should just loose the rest of our games so we get a good draft pick too.or maybe the team plane crashes so we can get some new players.
Dale;1085861 said:Bledsoe will get high praise from those who don't really know the team that well or who are just trying to make this QB controversy go away.
Most of us expect him to play very well. A poor performance would be much more surprising than a 335-yard, 3-TD effort.
These are the games he's great at. If he'd play, say, at Philly like he likely will at home against Houston, he'd be a perinneal (sp?) Pro Bowler.
Does that include Bill Parcells?Dale;1085861 said:Bledsoe will get high praise from those who don't really know the team that well or who are just trying to make this QB controversy go away.
Dale;1085873 said:Wait a second. I don't fall in the "I want Bledsoe to play poorly crowd," but their rationale is not just to fulfill their "Romo fantasy," as you say.
Their fear is simple: Bledsoe has a proven track record of failure/mediocrity against good teams on the road. Their rationale is that every time Bledsoe plays well against a poor team, we're merely delaying the inevitable of a poor performance against a good team on the road.
Again, their thinking is why continue wasting away in this cycle? Romo may be a complete failure, but let's see what we've got in him. That grass-is-greener mentality suggests he might be a better option than Bledsoe in these tough games, no matter the unlikelihood of a first-year starter doing that.
It's no different than with Testaverde a few years ago, only Bledsoe is better and so is this team. But the thinking then was Testaverde will get us to 7-9 and no better. Let's see what we've got with the youth. The thinking now is Bledsoe will take us to the first round of the playoffs, if he even takes us that far. Why not see if the kid can take us a little further, is what they're saying.
I couldn't agree more.CanadianCowboysFan;1085833 said:Yeah imagine that, some might actually want the QB to have a good game.