Ian Rapoport: Cowboys are starting QB Dak Prescott post-bye vs #Eagles, source said.

[cowboys2233]

It ain't broke, don't fix it.

Um, then why were so many people in support of trading an 1,800 yard back like Murray, who clearly was the driving force behind our 12 win season in 2014?

See, this is the problem - too many of you talk straight out of your ***** without recognizing the hypocrisy you're spouting.

 

[Stash]

And the receivers can't throw them either.

He did his job. Bryant and Beasley didn't do theirs. The touchdown throws were there, the receivers dropped them.

 

[Stash]

Um, then why were so many people in support of trading an 1,800 yard back like Murray, who clearly was the driving force behind our 12 win season in 2014?

See, this is the problem - too many of you talk straight out of your ***** without recognizing the hypocrisy you're spouting.

Trading Murray? When was that? Talk about "talking out of your ***"!

 

[Kevinicus]

He did his job. Bryant and Beasley didn't do theirs. The touchdown throws were there, the receivers dropped them.

He did his job...some of the time. Just like them.

 

[Stash]

He did his job...some of the time. Just like them.

What happens if either of them catches those touchdown passes?

 

[Bleu Star]

Did you feel that way about the 2014 team? I feel a bit more confident about this team primarily because of our defense.

No. The 2014 team was good but I was always a bundle of nerves. The usual... This year I have never been more calm and collected about the outcome of these games. This squad is something special and it's going to get even better down the stretch.

 

[Kevinicus]

What happens if either of them catches those touchdown passes?

Nobody can know that.

What happens if he throws to Beasely on the last drive, or throws to Dez's outside shoulder instead of the inside toward the defender on an endzone pass?

 

[Stash]

Nobody can know that.

What happens if he throws to Beasely on the last drive, or throws to Dez's outside shoulder instead of the inside toward the defender on an endzone pass?

Really? You "can't know" what would happen? More like you're trying to cover your eyes to what did happen.

Both receivers got their hands on both passes. At that point, the quarterback did his job of getting the ball to them, it's on them to do their job of catching them.

If either one does, Dallas doesn't lose that game by 1 point.

 

[jday]

I just want Dak to go out there and outperform wentz, and get the W. Then we can stop all these Wentz vs Dak debates as well

Yes because the first time Romo beat Eli that was the end of that tired debate.

 

[DallasEast]

Rapoport tweets the obvious and BAM! A well-duh, four-post maximum thread explodes, heading unsurprisingly towards the Quarterback Zoneland Of Mania. Meanwhile, the Wonder Twins and Gleek hold the touching Mighty Orphans thread isolated within The Great Hall of Justice Obscurity.

"Shape of a sabertooth tiger!"
"Shape of a mop bucket!"
"Ah-gleek, ah-gleek, eek eek!"

CowboysZone lol.

 

[mrmojo]

It's gonna be a long bye week

 

[noshame]

I just want Dak to go out there and outperform wentz, and get the W. Then we can stop all these Wentz vs Dak debates as well

The Vikings will take care of Wentz

 

[Kevinicus]

Really? You "can't know" what would happen? More like you're trying to cover your eyes to what did happen.

Both receivers got their hands on both passes. At that point, the quarterback did his job of getting the ball to them, it's on them to do their job of catching them.

If either one does, Dallas doesn't lose that game by 1 point.

Are you suggesting you can know? It's an impossibility. It's ridiculous to suggest otherwise. There are an infinite number of ways the game could have gone if those things happened. Am I giving you too much credit in thinking that you would realize that everything in the game from that point forward is different?

On those plays, Dak did his job, and the receivers failed at theirs. On other plays, the receivers did their jobs and got open and Dak failed to do his job and get them the ball. There were a lot of the latter in that Giants game, so yes, he did have something to do with the loss.

 

[Stash]

Are you suggesting you can know? It's an impossibility. It's ridiculous to suggest otherwise. There are an infinite number of ways the game could have gone if those things happened. Am I giving you too much credit in thinking that you would realize that everything in the game from that point forward is different?

I'm stating that it's a fact that Prescott did his job and his enough of his part to win that Giants game and have this team 6-0.

I'm not discussing variables or hypotheticals. Anyone who watched the game knows that the passes were catchable and the receivers dropped them, resulting in field goals instead of touchdowns and a 1-point loss. After that, no other speculation matters.

 

[Kevinicus]

I'm stating that it's a fact that Prescott did his job and his enough of his part to win that Giants game and have this team 6-0.

I'm not discussing variables or hypotheticals. Anyone who watched the game knows that the passes were catchable and the receivers dropped them, resulting in field goals instead of touchdowns and a 1-point loss. After that, no other speculation matters.

No point in arguing with people who don't understand basic logic or that things change drastically. It is flat out stupid, not ignorant but stupid, to not realize that just because the game ended in a 1 point difference that it absolutely would have had a different result if a FG on the first drive had been a TD instead. EVERY SINGLE THING after that point would change. Maybe in the Cowboys' favor, maybe in the Giants' favor.

And it's stupid, not ignorant, to suggest that just because someone does their job on one play that they're suddenly not responsible for their play the rest of the game, and have no influence on it.

Do you think the Giants just try to run the clock out near the end of the game if they don't have the lead?

 

[Stash]

No point in arguing with people who don't understand basic logic or that things change drastically. It is flat out stupid, not ignorant but stupid, to not realize that just because the game ended in a 1 point difference that it absolutely would have had a different result if a FG on the first drive had been a TD instead. EVERY SINGLE THING after that point would change. Maybe in the Cowboys' favor, maybe in the Giants' favor.

And it's stupid, not ignorant, to suggest that just because someone does their job on one play that they're suddenly not responsible for their play the rest of the game, and have no influence on it.

Do you think the Giants just try to run the clock out near the end of the game if they don't have the lead?

I'm not going to continue to argue this nonsense with you. Prescott did everything he needed to do in order for the Cowboys to be 6-0.

Deal with it.