Awakened;3781321 said:I think he is going to be a big-time NFL RB. We may regret it if we pass him up.
Awakened;3781321 said:I think he is going to be a big-time NFL RB. We may regret it if we pass him up.
That's good stuff. Nice post.TheCoolFan;3781379 said:Pass. Nothing against him but in today's NFL, you can win a Super Bowl without having a superstar RB. The last SB winner that had a great RB was probably the Ravens with Jamal Lewis or the Rams with Faulk. We have bigger holes to fill
2009 - Saints: Pierre Thomas/Reggie Bush
2008 - Steelers: Willie Parker/Rashad Mendenhall
2007 - Giants: Brandon Jacobs/Derrick Ward/Ahmad Bradshaw
2006 - Colts: Joseph Addai/Dominic Rhodes
2005 - Steelers: Willie Parker/Jerome Bettis
2004 - Pats: Corey Dillon
2003 - Pats: Kevin Faulk/Antowain Smith
2002 - Bucs: Michael Pittman/Mike Alstott
2001 - Pats: Antowain Smith
Randy White;3781637 said:I've been thinking about that quite a bit for the past few weeks. If I were in charge of the Cowboys, the option of picking this guy would be keeping me awake at night, probably all the way to the draft.
Call it black magic, voodoo, vision, dream, whatever, but every time I see him or somebody mentions his name, Emmitt Smith comes to mind. The parallels are just stunning. He's done absolutely nothing wrong and yet his stock has dropped into the 20's. Same as " that other guy ". He's got powerful legs, deceptive quickness, does not shy away from contact, but defenders don't seem to get a square hit on him, catches the ball very well, and all he does is produce.
The thing, though, is that we would have to blow up our entire backfield and almost change completely on offense. We'd have to move T.Choice or F.Jones, or both, make sure Gronko is the FB we want or get one who's suitable to be a lead blocker ( the kid from Stanford would be perfect ), we'd have to, obviously, improve the O-line inside, and the most difficult part is that we'd have to take away the focus of the offense from Tony and put it squarely on Ingram.
In other words, we'd have to go back to the '90's and revive that offense again.
Otherwise, we'd be doing Ingram a disservice.
ABQCOWBOY;3781685 said:I have exactly the same thoughts on this player RW. I don't honestly know that if no trade down were available and that if he were the best player on my board, I would not draft him. I don't love our backfield right now. I don't really see Choice as the every down back. I don't see Jones as that either, at the moment. I really do like Ingram.
I don't know. I'm in favor of drafting OLs, DLs, ILBs and DBs but this guy might be there. I don't know.
DFWJC;3781708 said:I'm kind of in that camp too about our backfield. I'm just not sure i would want to address it with Ingram if it had to be in the 1st round. You may want to look at his stats too: for the most part he had average or poor games (3.5 ypc) against the top 3-4 SEC teams. I do like him though.
Awakened;3781321 said:I think he is going to be a big-time NFL RB. We may regret it if we pass him up.
Verdict;3782003 said:He won't last this long, but I would love to see us take DeMarco Murray with a 2nd round pick. He is awesome catching passes out of the backfield and finds the end zone.
aikemirv;3781700 said:Jones and Choice are more than capable. When the 2 best RB's in the league don't make a difference for their teams, I just don't see the value for them that early ( and I am talking about Johnson and Peterson)
TheCount;3781706 said:RB's are one position you definitely don't need to spend a first round pick on, we already did that with Felix and so far it hasn't done us much good.
