If Dak doesn't win the superbowl this year, why should we continue to support a perpetual choker?

We must come to grips that we really don’t seriously want to win Super Bowls any longer.

If we did we’d be looking for someone to replace our 80 year old GM who’s strangle holding Cowboys Football for his own selfish endeavors.
 
Jake said:
If anyone questions this comparison, take a look at their career numbers. They are VERY much the same. Two 4th round QBs with similar performance, and bank accounts.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PresDa01.htm

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CousKi00.htm
Click to expand...
That’s a fair comparison. There are others like Derek Carr we could use. About half of the leagues starting QB’s.

Unfortunately most of the league doesn’t have an Elite Qb. They have to build around an average to slightly above or below average QB who if is on 2nd contract is probably over paid. Welcome to the NFL.
 
CowboysFever1973 said:
Romo at least had grit and I will always believe we win the SB the year he got benched for Dak!! Romo was also cheated out of a season because it was a catch!!!!
Click to expand...
Yea but our situation is very similar with a team that is more of a pretender than serious contender. Just enough for our egotistical owner to hype and sell hope for .

There’s been one constant this era. And he’s still there .
 
DuceizBak said:
Sorry to say that 2016 team wasn't winning a superbowl. They couldn't stop the Packers and they were missing one of their best receivers. You think they Stop Brady with a much better defense?
Click to expand...
True, but nobody wants to hear it.
They still would have lost if Dez makes that catch.
They couldn't stop Rogers to save their lives
 
CowboysFever1973 said:
Anybody who is under 40 doesn't understand. I'm getting old!!! I want another ring!! We had it too if we weren't cheated!!
Click to expand...
I'm way over 40 and guarantee I'm older than you and you don't understand.

Dak isn't the one accumulating 14 penalties in a playoff game but he's the one that has to overcome them.

He's also not the one dropping passes right in his hands but he has to overcome that.

Micah Parsons and our pass rush make people think we have an elite defense but we still can't stop the run and are a nose tackle away from there.

This is also something Dak can't control. Yes we have the talent to go deeper in the playoffs than one and done.

But there are still some things that have to be cleaned up before we can win a Super bowl and they don't involve DAk
 
Blackrain said:
I'm way over 40 and guarantee I'm older than you and you don't understand.

Dak isn't the one accumulating 14 penalties in a playoff game but he's the one that has to overcome them.

He's also not the one dropping passes right in his hands but he has to overcome that.

Micah Parsons and our pass rush make people think we have an elite defense but we still can't stop the run and are a nose tackle away from there.

This is also something Dak can't control. Yes we have the talent to go deeper in the playoffs than one and done.

But there are still some things that have to be cleaned up before we can win a Super bowl and they don't involve DAk
Click to expand...
You forgot to mention we all have to overcome Jerry the GM.
 
CowboysFever1973 said:
Romo at least had grit and I will always believe we win the SB the year he got benched for Dak!!
Click to expand...

Fantasyland. :rolleyes:

Dak put up 31 points against Green Bay. The defense gave up four TD drives of 75 yards or more, and couldn't hold for 30 seconds to force OT.

The Cowboys have never won a playoff game when the opponent scored 30+ points. They weren't winning a SB with that defense, Romo or not.
 
I knew a skid fan who said the same about Captain Kirk and look at all the success they’ve had since.
 
Dak can't win a Super Bowl. The Dallas Cowboys might can, but no QB can. Staubach didn't do it on his own. Aikman didn't do it on his own. Romo couldn't do it on his own.

Maybe this team will be good enough to win it with Dak like the '70s teams were with Staubach and the '90s teams were with Aikman, but we'll see. If we don't win and Dak is clearly the main reason why, then there's some merit to placing it all on his shoulders, but most years whether with Dak or Romo or Aikman in the mid-90s on, there were other reasons why our team failed to win. Bad offense lines, bad defense. It's asking a lot of a QB to overcome those things.
 
Blackrain said:
I'm way over 40 and guarantee I'm older than you and you don't understand.

Dak isn't the one accumulating 14 penalties in a playoff game but he's the one that has to overcome them.

He's also not the one dropping passes right in his hands but he has to overcome that.

Micah Parsons and our pass rush make people think we have an elite defense but we still can't stop the run and are a nose tackle away from there.

This is also something Dak can't control. Yes we have the talent to go deeper in the playoffs than one and done.

But there are still some things that have to be cleaned up before we can win a Super bowl and they don't involve DAk
Click to expand...
Jake said:
Fantasyland. :rolleyes:

Dak put up 31 points against Green Bay. The defense gave up four TD drives of 75 yards or more, and couldn't hold for 30 seconds to force OT.

The Cowboys have never won a playoff game when the opponent scored 30+ points. They weren't winning a SB with that defense, Romo or not.
Click to expand...

Well spoken and to the point.
 
Jake said:
Fantasyland. :rolleyes:

Dak put up 31 points against Green Bay. The defense gave up four TD drives of 75 yards or more, and couldn't hold for 30 seconds to force OT.

The Cowboys have never won a playoff game when the opponent scored 30+ points. They weren't winning a SB with that defense, Romo or not.
Click to expand...
What an impressive stat Jake.

And we’ve played a lot of playoff games in our history. 2nd most in NFL history I believe without looking it up. And we’ve never won one when giving up 30+ points. Wow!!!!
 
CowboysFever1973 said:
He's had enough time to win us the big one. No more excuses. He has that elite defense.

Tell me Cowboy Nation. Why should we support Dak if he goes 1 and done again in the playoffs? If he can't win with this defense quite frankly he never will!! I'm tired and I want superbowls. We all do. Dak isn't Aikman nor is he even Joe Flacco. He's a perpetual choker that never seems to show results come playoffs!!
Click to expand...


Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Dan Marino, John Elway, Jim Kelly and a host of other quarterbacks haven't won Superbowls after their first full 6 seasons..... I'm not saying Dak is better than any of these quarterbacks, but did you have the same bar set for those quarterbacks that you have for Dak???


Or is this another one of those "only apply to no other quarterbacks in history but Dak" threads?

Should those teams have gotten rid of those other quarterbacks that didn't win a Superbowl after 6 full seasons as well???

Oh yeah, and were these same quarterbacks I've named considered perpetual chokers for failing to win Superbowls in their first 6 and 7 fulls seasons as well. Im just trying to make sure this isn't one of them goal post moving, hypocritical, posts that we see on a daily basis.
 
Last edited:
GINeric said:
Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Dan Marino, John Elway, Jim Kelly and a host of other quarterbacks haven't won Superbowls after their first full 6 seasons..... im not say Dak is better than any of these quarterbacks, but did you have the same bar set for those quarterbacks that you have for Dak???


Or is this another one of those "only apply to no other quarterbacks in history but Dak" threads?

Should those teams have gotten rid of those other quarterbacks that didn't win a Superbowl after 6 full seasons as well???
Click to expand...
I’m not sure those are good comparisons. They had some great early success in playoffs, going to championships, Super Bowls and or leading the league in passing before finally winning a Super Bowl.
 
Diehardblues said:
What an impressive stat Jake.

And we’ve played a lot of playoff games in our history. 2nd most in NFL history I believe without looking it up. And we’ve never won one when giving up 30+ points. Wow!!!!
Click to expand...

I wish it wasn't true, especially in SB XIII and the NFC championship game of the 1994 season, but even Staubach and Aikman couldn't overcome allowing 30+ points in the postseason. And yet, we get these rationalizations that Dallas lost 34-31 to Green Bay because of Dak. Dak is Dak, but he's not the reason Dallas lost that game on that day.
 
Diehardblues said:
I’m not sure those are good comparisons. They had some great early success in playoffs, going to championships, Super Bowls and or leading the league in passing before finally winning a Super Bowl.
Click to expand...


Actually all of them didn't. Im not saying Dak is better than any of those quarterbacks.... but Dak won his first playoff game before a couple of them won their first. So when we're looking at the first 5, 6, 7 years of all of these quarterbacks.... i think its definitely a fair comparison.


The only problem is people give excuses for those other quarterbacks that isn't afforded to Dak. And here's the catch. Most of those other quarterbacks are 1st and 2nd rounders.... Dak was a 4th rounder.
 
Jake said:
Fantasyland. :rolleyes:

Dak put up 31 points against Green Bay. The defense gave up four TD drives of 75 yards or more, and couldn't hold for 30 seconds to force OT.

The Cowboys have never won a playoff game when the opponent scored 30+ points. They weren't winning a SB with that defense, Romo or not.
Click to expand...
:hammer::hammer:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 86 more.
Total: 4,044 (members: 186, guests: 3,858)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,127
Messages
13,790,293
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top