DallasDomination
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,791
- Reaction score
- 6,205
It doesnt matter because he didnt play.
Sharky said:"If Worms had machine guns chickens wouldn't "mess" with them"!!!!!!!!
calcbfan1 said:We would have still won with Gates in the game. We would have game planned for him and taken him out of the game like they did with Witten.
It may have been even easier if Gates had been in the game. Brees probably would have tried to force some throws and been intercepted even more than he was.
Thank youjksmith269 said:Does it matter? He didn't play we won next game please.
I really don't understand why worry about what if's it amazes me we lose people are blah blah we win and they look at way's and reasons we should of or could of lost.
CactusCowboy said:This is a question that cannot be answered because he did not play. I think we played very well, but I believe with Coates SD wins. They got negative yards out of there backup TE, Coates is Brees go to guy.
CactusCowboy said:This is a question that cannot be answered because he did not play. I think we played very well, but I believe with Coates SD wins. They got negative yards out of there backup TE, Coates is Brees go to guy.
CactusCowboy said:This is a question that cannot be answered because he did not play. I think we played very well, but I believe with Coates SD wins. They got negative yards out of there backup TE, Coates is Brees go to guy.
jem88 said:I'm no fan of the 'what if?' drill, but I'm fairly sure that in the opposite circumstances (ie. we had a star player out and lost narrowly), those very same eye-rolling 'realists' would be throwing up hypothetical scenarios to Dallas' advantage.