If lose 3-4 of next 5. Need to tank

Cowboysheelsreds053

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,979
Reaction score
11,874
This team ain’t good. D is pathetic. Trade parsons. Trade cooks to contender that wants wr. Tank for top 5 pick.

Just pinned in another thread few seconds ago, if we lose to the gnats and Niners and stealers next, may be that time. Since the Vikings were hoodwinked by Jimmy Johnson don’t see anyone ever giving up so many players again but something has to be done.
 

MysteryIceGuro

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,060
Reaction score
16,379
This team ain’t good. D is pathetic. Trade parsons. Trade cooks to contender that wants wr. Tank for top 5 pick.
We need to tank NOW. Build up a good team so we can draft a rookie QB to replace Dak in about 3/4 years.

Tank now: hire new coaches
Draft: LB/DT/O-linemen.

Tank Year 2:
Draft: RB, LB, DT, DE, more o-linemen,

tank year 3:
rookie qb (prime them to replace dak), wr, cb, safety.

tank year 4:
more offensive help and whatever else we need at that point in time.

our team should be primed by then. it will be a 4 year tank process however
 

McMicah

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
2,835
Honestly, the best strategy at this point is to sell off talent and go in the gutter for 3 years and try to get Daks replacement and high caliber picks like the Lions did

At the deadline you should drop Dlaw, Martin, Hooker, Wilson, anyone aging out. Get mid round picks and find some gems buried on the roster
 

McMicah

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
2,835
We need to tank NOW. Build up a good team so we can draft a rookie QB to replace Dak in about 3/4 years.

Tank now: hire new coaches
Draft: LB/DT/O-linemen.

Tank Year 2:
Draft: RB, LB, DT, DE, more o-linemen,

tank year 3:
rookie qb (prime them to replace dak), wr, cb, safety.

tank year 4:
more offensive help and whatever else we need at that point in time.

our team should be primed by then. it will be a 4 year tank process however
This is actually how a winning organization would think. You take the rollercoaster approach and have 4 bad years followed by 5-10 good and repeat.

Jerry doesn’t want a championship, he wants relevance and revenue
 

CT Dal Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,147
Reaction score
21,364
One thing that makes me feel better is just about this entire coaching staff is on one year deals.

Wholesale roster changes might not be possible, but a brand new scheme on both sides of the ball certainly is.
 

Ranching

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,825
Reaction score
111,115
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
This team ain’t good. D is pathetic. Trade parsons. Trade cooks to contender that wants wr. Tank for top 5 pick.
I'm for making changes, but losing on purpose is not in my DNA. We have young players that need to develop and buy in, losing on purpose for a chance at a Trey Lance like player? Hell no!
 

snadler

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,017
Reaction score
3,987
Funny how people say they need to tank, first the cowboys are not going to intentionally throw games, they just aren’t very good so the losing will take care of itself so it will just happen
 
Top