If Sean Payton comes to Dallas

CATCH17;4863341 said:

:laugh2: If you think that post substantiates ANYTHING you were trying to spin previously, you have a LOT of understanding to catch up on.


Embarrassing trying to throw that up as your justification. It is obvious Hos was trying to bunch your panties, which honestly looking at it from here, he did JUST THAT.

:laugh2: :laugh2:
 
Dallas;4863350 said:
:laugh2: If you think that post substantiates ANYTHING you were trying to spin previously, you have a LOT of understanding to catch up on.


Embarrassing trying to throw that up as your justification. It is obvious Hos was trying to bunch your panties, which honestly looking at it from here, he did JUST THAT.

:laugh2: :laugh2:
True that. I had not even gone back and seen that thread to see how many people it got then. Apparently several.
 
rocboy22;4863352 said:
not bad. but, it doesn't seem like some kind of proclamation or anything, though. Just an "I think", with an obvious jab after that line which really makes it look like it was really said for effect rather than an actual belief we would win out.

Damage control.
 
Dallas;4863350 said:
:laugh2: If you think that post substantiates ANYTHING you were trying to spin previously, you have a LOT of understanding to catch up on.


Embarrassing trying to throw that up as your justification. It is obvious Hos was trying to bunch your panties, which honestly looking at it from here, he did JUST THAT.

:laugh2: :laugh2:

Speaking of embarrassing, you got ***** slapped and it wasn't even your argument.:laugh1:
 
Dallas;4863350 said:
If you think that post substantiates ANYTHING you were trying to spin previously, you have a LOT of understanding to catch up on.


My "spin" was

CATCH17;4863268 said:
You're right. He also said the Cowboys would win out. Can't remember if it was after Atlanta or Philly.


Hostile;4826245 said:
I think we'll run the table from here.

That ought to make some people's undies bunch up.



Yeah. Bigtime "spin" by me.
 
Numbers921;4863360 said:
Damage control.
What damage? I'm damaged?

If anything it shows you got your undies in a bunch over an obvious joke. You got played. I win again.
 
Hostile;4863348 said:
LOL

I think we'll run the table from here.

That ought to make some people's undies bunch up.

Clearly was joking don't ya think? If you don't, that's just sad.

I will absolutely give you kudos though because I did not even remember saying that, joke or not.

Not that I want to get in the middle of this, but that highlighted sentence could just as easily be construed as..."I know people are going to say I'm crazy/a homer for thinking that.."

It's not really that clear that you were joking.

BUT I'M NOT GETTING IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS. GOODBYE!
 
rocboy22;4863362 said:
how is this damage control? please explain.

You're taking up for your boy. Based on his posting history, there's little doubt he wasn't taking a jab, but it was likely something he believed at the time. If he wasn't being serious with the post, he's no better than the people that he claims are trolling the board or whatever for a reaction.
 
1310749411_InBeforeTheLock.jpg
 
DOUBLE WING;4863365 said:
Not that I want to get in the middle of this, but that highlighted sentence could just as easily be construed as..."I know people are going to say I'm crazy/a homer for thinking that.."

It's not really that clear that you were joking.

BUT I'M NOT GETTING IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS. GOODBYE!
Can I ask you some serious questions before you assume that?

Did I ever come back to the thread? How many people posted comments? If I was doing anything but joking, knowing what you know about me, don't you think I'd have defended my stance like a dog fighting over a bone? Regardless of how much you dislike me, do I run away from my beliefs?

It was an obvious joke as evidenced by the last comment, otherwise I'd have said more and I never did. Now, you can call that trolling for reactions, and perhaps I did. It obviously worked though didn't it?

Hell, I didn't even remember posting that here. Tells you how serious about it was.
 
Numbers921;4863369 said:
You're taking up for your boy. Based on his posting history, there's little doubt he wasn't taking a jab, but it was likely something he believed at the time. If he wasn't being serious with the post, he's no better than the people that he claims are trolling the board or whatever for a reaction.

my boy, huh? cool, I guess I got a "boy" on here. I posted what I thought from what I saw. I never said he did not say it - just to produce proof or shut up. You produced proof, which you should have, and I said "not bad", because he obviously said it - but added what I thought it looked like.
 
Chocolate Lab;4863370 said:

This thread has a topic and the topic is sean payton.

isnt it weird howabout halfway through it just stops being about sean payton?

shocked.
 
rocboy22;4863389 said:
my boy, huh? cool, I guess I got a "boy" on here. I posted what I thought from what I saw. I never said he did not say it - just to produce proof or shut up. You produced proof, which you should have, and I said "not bad", because he obviously said it - but added what I thought it looked like.
I didn't know we were boys either.

Hi, I'm Hos. Nice to know you.
 
theebs;4863392 said:
This thread has a topic and the topic is sean payton.

isnt it weird howabout halfway through it just stops being about sean payton?

shocked.
I'm not and reported it a long time ago.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,556
Messages
14,545,430
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top