vta;2306455 said:Bah.
They should consider cutting off some of the dead weight like the Cardinals.
Too many teams would just be overkill.
windward;2306459 said:If we contracted, I'd vote for the contraction of the Jaguars and Panthers.
windward;2306449 said:If the NFL made a decision to add a 33rd team,which city do you think should get it?
I'd say Birmingham or Southern California
vta;2306455 said:Bah.
They should consider cutting off some of the dead weight like the Cardinals.
Too many teams would just be overkill.
The voice of reason in this thread.JackMagist;2306526 said:The league has reached a perfect equilibrium with an equal number of teams in each division and a balanced playoff system...I see no reason to throw it all out of whack by adding an oddball team. I doubt that the NFL sees any reason to do so either since they are the most popular sport in our country.
I can see only one change that makes any sense and that is to let the number four seed be vulnerable to a Wild Card with a BETTER (not equal with a tie breaker advantage but BETTER) record knock them out of the playoffs. That is tweaking a near perfect system but it would make it a little more interesting down the stretch for a lot of teams.
dadymat;2306510 said:I for one think Cali has enough teams.....I think Alabama would be a good choice... they love some football......
Boysboy;2306634 said:Oklahoma City
Mexico Citywindward;2306449 said:If the NFL made a decision to add a 33rd team,which city do you think should get it?
I'd say Birmingham or Southern California