If you think Dak played well

Not blaming Dak for this ........... he did not play great but he was running for his life most of game.

This is a total team, coaching staff, front office failure.
 
Clove said:
SO WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT BUT YAP ON A CHAT BOARD? What I wanted to do was not sign Dak, BUT GUESS WHO DID? What I wanted to do was tank this year to get a 1st pick and draft the future, BUT GUESS WHO'S NOT DOING THAT? It's pointless if the Owner does whatever tf he wants to do, and leaves us here to argue amongst ourselves like a bunch of idiots.
Click to expand...
You don't have to yell dude...sheesh!
 
WillieBeamen said:
Im seeing a lot of fans “relieved” that the defense should shoulder the blame for this loss as opposed to lumping Dak in there as well.

He played a bad game. The lazy will look at the stat sheet and see he threw for over 300 yards and the ints were the fault of the receivers.

He was inaccurate on several deep passes (got CD concussed).

Threw that horrific backwards pass instead of throwing it away

Led 0 Td drives in the first half against a team missing most of their secondary.
Click to expand...
got CD concussed....so you just showed your bias.....totally.....he got CD concussed...not because CD fell and hit his head, as all football players on every play fall, get tackled and so on...but he got CD concussed.
and you just exonerated everybody else on the offense...nope, it was Dak all by himself that led to zero TDs.
and you looked at the stat sheet to come up with that...yet you accused everybody else of looking at stat sheet....the hypocricy is mind numbing stupid.

question: was it his fault Jake ferguson fumbled? just wondering how Dak is responsible for that?
question 2: we were in 2nd and 7 and longer in first half after a 1st down run 4 out of 5 times and the only other time it was a 4 yard run by turpin. meaning what? we were n 2nd long situations most of the time in the first half. in fact we got one first down by a run and that was Dak for one yard sneak.

but yeah, it was all Dak....and you looking into the details.
Dak had issues, but looking at stat sheets like you do, you missed the forest because of the trees. and I am not defending Dak, just calling out a big bullshirter like you

ladies and gentlmen, stupidity at its best
the stupid post of the week is already determined. nothing can be more stupid.
 
Shotgun Dave said:
If you think I’m “making it up” that there are an easily identified and well-known number of people who criticize Dak for every little thing, I don’t know what to tell you.

In other news, water is wet and the sky is blue.

And you’re their mother now? Anyone who wants to clarify with me is free to ask.

Unless they’re on my ignore list, of course, as I’ve already determined those folks to be a complete waste of time.
Click to expand...
If you don't name them...how are they supposed to tell you made up lies about them?

It's clear you've made up this narrative. Just admit it like an adult instead of a petulent child.

"criticizing dak for every little thing"?...is NOT "just blaming only Dak."/.

Goal posts moved.
 
Captain-Crash said:
dak needs all numbers 1s on offense, with some backup number 1s, in case one isn't playing lights out, carrying him. I hope we do some trading for these guys, dak needs them.
Click to expand...
I know tell me....that ferguson fumble really got on my nerves and that was all Dak because where he threw the ball and how fergi was forced to carry it the way he did...just awful
and Nate thomas just not seeing the DE, Dak should have told him to watch out on that side. that was all dak. the same with Steele when he missed his guy, that was because of Dak. he should have seen where the DE was lined up and warn steele about that move...how could he be so stupid and so bad.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
If you don't name them...how are they supposed to tell you made up lies about them?

It's clear you've made up this narrative. Just admit it like an adult instead of a petulent child.

"criticizing dak for every little thing"?...is NOT "just blaming only Dak."/.

Goal posts moved.
Click to expand...
You know who is he is talking about why are you trying to have him call out posters?
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
If you don't name them...how are they supposed to tell you made up lies about them?

It's clear you've made up this narrative. Just admit it like an adult instead of a petulent child.
Click to expand...
They know who they are, and I didn’t ask for your input anyway, mom. There is literally post after post saying as much, mom.

Pound sand. #anotheroneontheignorelist
 
I respect your viewpoint but I have to disagree. At the risk of sounding like a Dak apologist he kept the Cowboys in this game. The pass protection was horrendous. Both picks were off the receivers' hands. Pickens was terrible. Lamb left the game early. Ferguson had another boneheaded fumble. There wasn't much room for Javonte to run.

Was Dak perfect? Heck no. Did he play well? Under the circumstances, yes. Definitely.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
If you don't name them...how are they supposed to tell you made up lies about them?

It's clear you've made up this narrative. Just admit it like an adult instead of a petulent child.

"criticizing dak for every little thing"?...is NOT "just blaming only Dak."/.

Goal posts moved.
Click to expand...
He's talking about the half dozen Dak lovers/haters. Have no idea why they get so much mention here, it's such a tiny number.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

Total: 3,531 (members: 83, guests: 3,448)
Robots: 1,133

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
475,616
Messages
14,627,123
Members
24,220
Latest member
Wineorange
Back
Top