I'm so tired of seeing this one-sided officiating

TheDallasDon

AegonTheConqueror-Now bend the knee
Messages
2,884
Reaction score
401
I'm so tired of seeing this one-sided officiating.

Its not the calls we get.............its the calls the other team that face us don't get called!
I know that we would should have won that game but its so unfair that we have to beat NFL teams and the refs!!!
 
I just didn't understand the disparity in no huddle ball placement time. That was pretty stupid.
 
Brady and his WR's argue and plead after every incomplete pass. Part of their game plan to draw some cheap calls. Also, Every time Brady gets touched he looks at the ref for a call.
 
JustDezIt;4184995 said:
they were def holding, a lot
When aren't they?

Ware has to be held more than any other player in the NFL and gets less calls for it.
 
It does get old. I mean the very first play of the game, you can call what Phillips did on every offenseive player on almost every play.
 
I thought the roughing call on Brady was pretty damn touchy. Romo got hit like that several times and there was not a flag.
 
tupperware;4184999 said:
When aren't they?

Ware has to be held more than any other player in the NFL and gets less calls for it.

This is my point I don't care about the holds, the ruffing the passer, and etc that's called on us........its the call that we don't get going are way that I hate! I see so many penalties against opposing teams that are never called
 
Star4Ever;4185003 said:
I thought the roughing call on Brady was pretty damn touchy. Romo got hit like that several times and there was not a flag.

Romo doesn't look for the call. Brady does after each and every hit he takes. His WR's also complain after every incomplete pass. I'm telling you that it is part of their game plan. Belichick is smart and if he even gets one call to go his way then it worked.
 
hornitosmonster;4185021 said:
Romo doesn't look for the call. Brady does after each and every hit he takes. His WR's also complain after every incomplete pass. I'm telling you that it is part of their game plan. Belichick is smart and if he even gets one call to go his way then it worked.

IF this is the case, then NFL officials are inept. A penalty occurs or it doesn't. *****ing about it should not influence ANY official. If it does, that official should be looking for another job. Why not just pay them a few dollars for a call. It's basically the same damn thing.
 
gmoney112;4184971 said:
I just didn't understand the disparity in no huddle ball placement time. That was pretty stupid.

No it wasnt our coach is a moron sometimes. When you substitute players in your opponent gets time to do the same. We are going no huddle and substituting in new packages, the Pats kept the same personnel on the field.
 
I laughed out loud when Brian Waters reached out and grabbed Brooking's jersey on their second play from scrimmage and it wasn't called. I thought they were extremely ticky tack on two of the holding calls against us, but I haven't reviewed the game, so I can't say that it wasn't balanced. I can only say what my biased eyes saw.

If they call holding here, the Pats face second and 19 instead of first down in FG range. That missed call was worth a couple of points.

[IMG]http://i29.***BLOCKED***/albums/c269/coolmoe/Screenshot2011-10-17at95812AM.png[/IMG]
 
kmd24;4185042 said:
I laughed out loud when Brian Waters reached out and grabbed Brooking's jersey on their second play from scrimmage and it wasn't called. I thought they were extremely ticky tack on two of the holding calls against us, but I haven't reviewed the game, so I can't say that it wasn't balanced. I can only say what my biased eyes saw.

If they call holding here, the Pats face second and 19 instead of first down in FG range. That missed call was worth a couple of points.

[IMG]http://i29.***BLOCKED***/albums/c269/coolmoe/Screenshot2011-10-17at95812AM.png[/IMG]

Brooking ran through the attempted hold
 
Yeagermeister;4185140 said:
Brooking ran through the attempted hold

The entire point of calling penalties is if they impact the play.

That hold didn't, so in my mind, the refs are OK for not calling it.
 
AbeBeta;4185148 said:
The entire point of calling penalties is if they impact the play.

That hold didn't, so in my mind, the refs are OK for not calling it.

You missed the joke

That was the excuse a ref gave once for not calling Wash for a hold on Greg Ellis :laugh1:
 
AbeBeta;4185148 said:
The entire point of calling penalties is if they impact the play.

That hold didn't, so in my mind, the refs are OK for not calling it.

Are you joking or being sarcastic? Brooking was right at the point of attack. Ridley had to cut right to avoid him. If he's not held it's probably a 2-yard loss.

http://i29.***BLOCKED***/albums/c269/coolmoe/Screenshot2011-10-17at103837AM.png
 
Yeagermeister;4185156 said:
You missed the joke

That was the excuse a ref gave once for not calling Wash for a hold on Greg Ellis :laugh1:

It it still early in the am where I am
 
Two things I expect every game:

1. Several non-calls against our opponents when it's very obvious.

2. Every field goal to be made by our opponent.
 
gmoney112;4184971 said:
I just didn't understand the disparity in no huddle ball placement time. That was pretty stupid.

I recall one play where the Cowboys were in no huddle, lined up ready to go, and the Patriots were still making substitutions, but the ref was standing over the ball so that the Cowboys couldn't snap it. I don't know if there is a rule where substitutions need to be made before the ball is snapped or not, but that look awful suspicious and crappy to me. The Cowboys would have had a free play essentially.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,586
Messages
14,546,955
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top