A defender swatting the ball cant be a delay of game when the defender swatted it before the whistle. He was trying to cause a fumble. Part of officials calling delay of game in these scenarios comes down to the judgement of the players intent. Similar to a player laying on top of a pile and not getting up while holding down an offensive player. What intent would a reasonable person find dallas defender could have in swatting the ball away from a giants player in that situation.
Judgement calls. The official determined Beckham didn't have the intentions of milking game clock by doing what he did. Of course they could have ruled the other way if they wanted to be jerks also.
I agree with the train of thought. OTOH, if a player kicks or otherwise delays an official from timely getting the ball back to where it can be put back in play then a delay infraction can occur.
Here are the rules for the 25 second situation:
SECTION 6 - DELAY OF GAME
ARTICLE 1. 40-SECOND PLAY CLOCK
It is a delay of the game if the ball is not put in play by a snap within 40 seconds after the start of the play clock. The play clock operator shall time the interval between plays upon signals from game officials. The 40-second interval starts when a play ends, unless Article 2 below applies.
ARTICLE 2. 25-SECOND PLAY CLOCK
In the event of certain administrative stoppages or other delays, a team will have 25 seconds, beginning with the Referee’s whistle, to put the ball in play by a snap or a kick. Such stoppages include, but are not limited to:
- a change of possession
- a charged team timeout
- the two-minute warning
- the expiration of a period
- a penalty enforcement
- a Try
- a Free Kick.
A 25-second interval will be used in these situations, even if the 40-second clock is already counting down.
There was a delay in the game although no infraction was enforced.