FuzzyLumpkins said:
I dont see how after three years, Henson is on his last leg while after four, Romo is some entrenched incumbent. Fact is that I have yet to ever see Romo play well in preseason or anywhere else. i see a lot of mediocre production from him. Toss in the fact that the coach who was all over his jock, Peyton, is gone and this is final year of his contract and it makes sense that this is Romo's last shot to do something with the Cowboys.
Romo has to do something meriting him deserving another contract.
Henson is still under contract for a few more yearsand at the very least put together a good half against Baltimore and is playing well in NFLE.
That all being said this will be a matchup to watch.
I understand what you're saying but I think you're misunderstanding my point. Bledsoe may be here a few more years but the Cowboys have to assume this is his last year in terms of planning. What I mean is the guy that's dubbed #2 this year is Bledsoe's heir apparent, assuming at least one of them shows they can do it. And the loser, whoever that is, knows that clipboard holding time continues, maybe forever. I can't see either guy, but particularly Henson being cool with that. Yeah he's under contract. But if he's #3 he'll want out and I think he'll be moved. I'm really pretty neutral at this point on the battle itself.
At the same time, fans around here remind me of the media speculating on Parcells when it comes to Peterman. Parcells says the guy is only playing at LG and all of a sudden its interpreted as he sucks.
It's hard to know much of anything about Peterman- we haven't seen much of him on the field. But I do know this- our roster is going to require some VERY tough cuts. An OL guy that isn't a starter and plays only one position is not in a strong position.
Now I can think of several alternate scenarios as to why he would only get reps at LG that dont involve him sucking which begins with the fact that last year was his first season that he actually got practice reps after being hurt his rookie year. Bottomline is that if Peterman pllays well hell be competing with Kosier and not the 7th rounder.
I agree but I got the sense from BP at his PC when asked why Peterman wasn't being considered for the RG slot when Rivera got hurt that Peterman was somehow in the coaches minds limited to LG. He didn't really explain why. Mybe it was because of lack of reps but it didn't sound that way. My point is if Peterman isn't the starter he could have a problem.
If Ellis wants to be a jackass i say trade him. Jim Jeffcoat excelled in a role that Ellis would have to if Canty won out and thus extended his career. Ellis is solid but will never be the allpro that it appears he thinks he is.
Sadly I have to agree. I don't think he'll be disruptive though.
UDFA vs. established and developing WR. Excuse me if Im not buying into this 'battle.'
BP sure sounded in his call to Austin like the kid has a real chance. And Copper in a UDFA himself and has done nothing as a WR in games to justify being called established or developing.
Shanle and Fowler and Burnett and Singleton and Boimn all say hello. Its going to take a miracle for these UDFA to make the squad.
Singleton and Boiman are not inside backers so they're not relevant to Parham and Hoyte's chances. Our run D was only average the 2nd half of last year. Both Parham and Hoyte are run stuffers. One of them has a great shot at making the team IMO.
You really need to combine these two into one big battle and add Pile. I doubt more than three of the five make the team. Williams and Davis are guaranteed spots but I cant help but feel that if Pile Beriault or Watkins show something that Coleman is going to get the Izell Reese treatment. Coleman was downright horrible last season and apparently has been boozing it up lately.
Unless BP changes his mind Beriault is working at SS. I think Davis will be moved to SS also because that's a better fit for him so one of them has to go. Watkins, Coleman and Pile are competing for 2 slots. Coleman's experience gives him a leg up going in. Coleman has been a much better player than Izell Reese and Parcells knows him. But you're right he's not a shoe in for a slot.