Interesting Stat

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,968
Reaction score
26,611
Estatic to have both players.

me too. if only we could keep both players that would be ideal. but thats not very likley so we do have to decide which we are gonna keep.i think free is the better player, but he also may be much more expensive. i think age won't be a big factor but i do think signability will determine which we keep and which we let walk and parnell may very well be easier, and cheaper to sign. but we shall see
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,201
Reaction score
64,705
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I think they were running left more to attack JPP. Keep him honest so he just doesn't get to rush the passer every down.
YR
That makes sense, although it seems like they would have done it in the 1st game also.

I don't remember when Tyron first injured his ankle, but that could have been a factor also if he had just injured it back around the 1st game.

Like I said in another post, I threw the Parnell vs Free issue in there to be funny because everybody knows I like Parnell over Free. It's funny because it makes some people angry for some reason.
 

Fredd

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,995
Reaction score
2,238
Thanks.

Does it not seem odd that they would reduce the runs to the right by 1/3rd against the same team with the same LDE and generally the same defensive players?

It would seem odd to me to match what you did from one game to another for the same opponent...they likely looked at that video, so DON'T do the same thing and give the defense an edge
 

foofighters

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,454
Reaction score
7,150
In the 1st game against the Giants, the Cowboys ran right 18 times. Parnell was the RT.

In the 2nd game against the Giants, the Cowboys ran right 6 times. Free was the RT.

It seems that Linehan thinks that Parnell is a better run blocker than Free.

Parnell's jock strap smell is strong with this one...
 
Top