Interesting Tweet by Peter King

[Longboysfan]

All I know is the Patriots started to bring this guy with them on the road. So the argument of Rogah is hogwash. As Sharper said in a tweet two days ago, he's surprised this aspect of the Patriots bringing the main guy behind the scandal has not gotten that much attention yet.

It would be interesting to see what games they brought him for the past 5 years.
Oh.. Wait a minute....
That would be the full disclosure they promised....
But then we know about Patriot promises....

 

[khiladi]

It would be interesting to see what games they brought him for the past 5 years.oy
Oh.. Wait a minute....
That would be the full disclosure they promised....
But then we know about Patriot promises....

This is so comical, trying to just put it on lone acts of a ball-boy...

The fact this guy has been with them for over 30 plus years explains it all...

People should camp outside Ernie Adams house.. This is the guy that Matt Walsh supposedly handed the Spygate tapes too, way before anybody knew who Adams was. If Matt Walsh was a nobody, how would he know Ernie?

 

[Longboysfan]

This is so comical, trying to just put it on the ball-boys... The fact this guy has been with them for over 30 plus years explains it all...

Yes. Like the ball changing parsonnel have a chance to do that in full view.

 

[EST_1986]

Warren Sharper dispels the myth that Jim McNally was only at home games via the Wells Report..

Read the footnote... Brady and the organization are guilty as hell... There is a reason the Patriots are refusing to cooperate. The best manner in which this goes for them is Tom Brady alone is implicated and it's seen as a single individual. It's systematic, from top to bottom.

You're kind of ruining the twist of this thread. Keep on topic, without all the facts of course.

 

[irishline]

Warren Sharper dispels the myth that Jim McNally was only at home games via the Wells Report..

Read the footnote... Brady and the organization are guilty as hell... There is a reason the Patriots are refusing to cooperate. The best manner in which this goes for them is Tom Brady alone is implicated and it's seen as a single individual. It's systematic, from top to bottom.

Well I guess that deflates Peter King's tweet a little bit.

Just like Rogah though to skip over facts (which he spent hours reading the day it came out) and go with the "expert" that he agrees with...

again...

Ah the memories...

Why? Why get the facts right in the first place.
Quote on stats within the norm not those outside the norm.

If they were deflating balls both on the road and at home the stats are within the norm though, aren't they? What he is posting that the wells report alludes someone travelled with the team, and is involved in this, who could do just that.

 

[Yakuza Rich]

People should camp outside Ernie Adams house.. This is the guy that Matt Walsh supposedly handed the Spygate tapes too, way before anybody knew who Adams was. If Matt Walsh was a nobody, how would he know Ernie?

What was even more disgusting was Kraft was trying to sue Walsh before Arlen Specter forced the league to not allow the Pats to sue Walsh. They then tried to tarnish Walsh's reputation and called him a liar when he was the only guy that was telling the truth. And each and every instance, the Patriots lied each step of the way.




YR

 

[texbumthelife]

And this still doesn't take away from the fact that Brady called for the balls to be deflated.

And it still doesn't take away from the fact that Brady pleaded with the NFL to allow teams to handle their own game balls. He was on the forefront of it.

Remember, same guy that claimed he didn't 'know nuttin' about PSI, the rule or the rule change despite being the fact that HE was the guy that lobbied for the rule change.

He's a liar and a cheater.

Oh, BTW:

Ints (home): 26
Ints (road): 39

And pre-2006:

1 TD thrown for every 20.7 pass attempts
1 INT thrown for every 38.6 pass attempts

Post-2006

1 TD thrown for every 17.2 pass attempts
1 INT thrown for every 60 pass attempts

So, he decreased his INT per attempt rate by 56%

He was extremely steady and consistent with his INT rate prior to 2007. Same with his fumble rate. Then, at the same time that he lobbied for the rule to be changed and it was changed...he improved his INT rate and fumble rate *immediately* at an astounding rate. There was no steady improvement, it was a drastic, overnight improvement from being quite good to historically great.





YR

That's /thread right there boys and girls.

PWN3D

 

[AdamJT13]

Well I guess that deflates Peter King's tweet a little bit.

Yep. Compare Brady's home/road splits over the past two seasons, since McNally STOPPED travelling with the team on road games.

2014 home = 103.8 rating
2014 road = 90.4 rating

2013 home = 92.8 rating
2013 road = 82.3 rating

Purely coincidental, I'm sure.

 

[dogberry]

The intensity of the game between the Patriots and the Colts on Sunday night .....

NE running backs will have fingers chopped off after each fumble.

Autographed footballs will continue to be sent to McN during his suspension.

The IRS will require 1099s with free footballs.

A new league group will monitor psi and footballs.

Mentioning Arlen Spector did not make me happy.

Wish Nors were here to fight to the end.

Kraft will hire real pros to run covert operations.

No tweeting and use throw away phones.

 

[visionary]

This is for all you people who think the rule change in 2006 somehow helped Brady (even though you all mistakenly think that the rule was changed in 2007)

"For the record: Teams bring conditioned balls on the road. Teams do not bring ballboys on the road. So if teams have ballboys at home + Brady asked ballboys to doctor balls' inflation levels, that could happen at home. Couldn't happen on the road."

and

"Brady TD passes since 2006:
Home: 131 in 65 games
Road: 138 in 64 games"

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.................

Weren't you tre one with all the bluster about 'just wait for the Wells report' ? And then the Wells report came out.......and .......BOOM!!

 

[Beast_from_East]

That gam between the Pats and Colts is going to be wild...............LOL

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

You went from claiming inside sources and calling everyone idiots to grasping at straws.

Lol. Pathetic.

 

[big dog cowboy]

 

[Future]

Ints (home): 26
Ints (road): 39

And pre-2006:

1 TD thrown for every 20.7 pass attempts
1 INT thrown for every 38.6 pass attempts

Post-2006

1 TD thrown for every 17.2 pass attempts
1 INT thrown for every 60 pass attempts

So, he decreased his INT per attempt rate by 56%

Over the first four years of his career (sans 2009 with injury), Romo's INT% was 3.5. Over the last 4 it was just 2.2. From 2010 to 2011 it went from 3.3 to 1.9, a 56% decrease. There was nothing gradual about Tony's INT rate changing, did he start deflating the ball?

If people are upset with Brady for cheating, fine. But there is almost nothing to suggest that it has impacted...anything.

Also, people forget that Manning and Brady got more than 20 QBs to sign their petition about how balls were handled during road games.

 

[Yakuza Rich]

Over the first four years of his career (sans 2009 with injury), Romo's INT% was 3.5. Over the last 4 it was just 2.2. From 2010 to 2011 it went from 3.3 to 1.9, a 56% decrease. There was nothing gradual about Tony's INT rate changing, did he start deflating the ball?

If people are upset with Brady for cheating, fine. But there is almost nothing to suggest that it has impacted...anything.

I disagree and your Romo example is not even close to the Brady example. Brady had 6 years of starting under his belt before 2007. He didn't just improve, he improve his INT rate and his fumble rate by *historical* margins. Compared to Romo who had a decent INT and fumble rate and then became pretty good at not fumbling and throwing picks.

The numbers simply DO suggest that it has impacted Brady's performance. Whether that can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is another thing.

Although the simple suggestion is to NOT cheat in the first place, so your integrity and your accomplishments will not be questioned.





YR