Iron Man II trailer is out.

Teren_Kanan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
319
Iron Man was a fantastic super hero movie. Hopefully it follows the trend of Superhero part 2's being better than part 1's.. without following the trend of Superhero part 3 being absolute crap.

Spider man? Good movie.. Spiderman 2? Awesome.. Spiderman 3? Think someone just **** in my mouth.

X-men? ok movie.. X-men 2? Amazing!.. Xmen 3? Can I have my money back please, and can the director please be shot.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Teren_Kanan;3152338 said:
Iron Man was a fantastic super hero movie. Hopefully it follows the trend of Superhero part 2's being better than part 1's.. without following the trend of Superhero part 3 being absolute crap.

Spider man? Good movie.. Spiderman 2? Awesome.. Spiderman 3? Think someone just **** in my mouth.

X-men? ok movie.. X-men 2? Amazing!.. Xmen 3? Can I have my money back please, and can the director please be shot.

hopefully

because Iron Man 1 sucked
 

the kid 05

Individuals play the game, but teams beat the odds
Messages
9,543
Reaction score
3
Teren_Kanan;3152338 said:
Iron Man was a fantastic super hero movie. Hopefully it follows the trend of Superhero part 2's being better than part 1's.. without following the trend of Superhero part 3 being absolute crap.

Spider man? Good movie.. Spiderman 2? Awesome.. Spiderman 3? Think someone just **** in my mouth.

X-men? ok movie.. X-men 2? Amazing!.. Xmen 3? Can I have my money back please, and can the director please be shot.

if you thought any of those were good you need your head checked.
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,309
Reaction score
396
Teren_Kanan;3152338 said:
X-men? ok movie.. X-men 2? Amazing!.. Xmen 3? Can I have my money back please, and can the director please be shot.

If you shoot him, I'll pay for the bullets!

brettratner.jpg


Brett Ratner, the man who brought us the Rush Hour series and Money Talks!
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Looks good but I don't think the antagonist of the movie is that interesting.

Gotta love Samuel L. as Nick Fury :laugh2: .
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
Maikeru-sama;3152992 said:
Looks good but I don't think the antagonist of the movie is that interesting.

Gotta love Samuel L. as Nick Fury :laugh2: .

At least they didn't put a wig on Sam this time.:laugh2:
 

Teren_Kanan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
319
Yeah I hate Ratner quite a bit.

And I'd ask you guys why those movies were "bad"?

X-men 1 was Rather boring, and it changed a lot so I didn't love it, but the acting was just fine, the plot made sense for an Xmen plot. They destroyed some of the characters which upset me, but for what it was, not a bad movie.

X-men 2 came back with an R rating, totally action packed with scenes of bad assery abound. No serious problems with the plot or character development, acting was on par with what should be expected. Other then simply not enjoying a "Mutant super ability" themed movie, I don't know what was "bad" about it. I'd like to hear your comments. Hello, Magneto ripping someones blood out of their body for the iron in it. If you can get over the changes to the characters/storyline from the first movie, this movie was really well done. If you're a comic purist.. you probably won't like them at all =p

X-men 3.. Just ***. So many problems with the Plot, Character development was atrocious. They killed a main character.. OFF SCREEN, and only "Mentioned" it later. That's just bad story telling. They split so far off from the X-men world that it shouldn't even have been named X-men anymore. The entire movie was horribly rushed. Then the big cluster **** fight at the end, full of mutants who's only apperant powers are the ability to jump really high and fight like thugs, was just awful. I could go into far more detail of why this was a bad movie, but It'd take up a huge amount of space.

Spiderman 1 and 2 were basically the same movie. I enjoyed them both. The original spiderman comics were very cheesy, the movied emulated this. Again, they changed a few things, but some of it was understandable, and didn't really detract from the movie. The movies looked good, the plot made sense, the character development was fine (pushed the limits in Spiderman 2 though), and were overall enjoyable movies, lacking in plot holes and ****ty directing. The CGI in the movie was also greatly done.

Spiderman 3. They simply tried to fit way too much into the story and failed epicly. The character development was atrocious. They forced entire background/storylines into new characters with very little screen time. They played around with Spiderman's Dark Persona theme, for like 10 minutes, rushed it, and totally failed. They pulled the Jazz Flute scene straight out of Ron Burgandy, and stuck it in Spiderman, I was embarrassed during that scene, it was so out of place bad. Also, they destroyed Venom/Eddie Brock, his character was so bad and SO different from the comics that it made no sense.

Iron man? What wasn't to like. The plot made sense, the character development was great. There were no major storytelling flaws, it was well directed, and as true to the series as possible. They NAILED Tony Stark, his character was amazing as was Robert Downy.

Again, if you're not a fan of the comics, not a fan of super hero-esque themes, I can understand why you didn't like them, but most of them did not suffer the Plotline/character development/acting problems that most ****ty movies suffer from.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I had no intention on seeing the first movie, but my son insisted upon it. It blew ***. No way I'm seeing this one even if he begs. If he really wants to see it, he had better beg his mother.
 
Top