Marriott will pay. This is NOT sexual assault. And lets just say that Irvin was trying to pick her up using some sexual content. So what?
And I’ve been saying all along Irvin’s witnesses were nowhere near the actual incident, so when they said “everything was fine…looked normal” it was completely hollow and just more posturing for optics by his legal team.
The case is not about sexual assault. Never was. It was about a lewd comment. Mike said that himself on the radio interview. The tape is truer to what Marriott said happened physically and there's no audio.
Marriott said he sexually assaulted her. This completely disproves that.
They were speaking to expecting her to slap him after a comment or something physical. This case was never about something physical but I think Irvin's team knows that plays better to get people "outraged" so they made it about that despite Mike's own words that it was about something he said to the employee.
Sexual Harassment is what they said. Here's a link to a filing of their accusations. Find Sexual Assault in here and get back to me. Page 3 is where their account of the incident starts. Read it and compare it to the video and tell me that it doesn't more clearly match what they say.
Exactly. I could see if he said these things to a coworker or something of the sort where HR would be involved. But this whole thing seems a lot about nothing.
Her body language says it all, her head goes back a couple of times which shows she was laughing at something he said and the fact she had her hands behind her back and kicked her foot forward shows me nothing was said to her that was insulting and when she was walking away, her head was towards Michael and saying something to Mike
Security was with her by that point. And what about those two "no-like" motions she did with her hands? She did back up several times as he moved forward too. What about that body language? That looks defensive to me.
Luuuulz.
