1) people are using alternative facts here... that manager starts to clap at almost the exact same time Irvin and the female engage in conversation.
2) She clearly leans around the pilar to see which way Mike is going, then moves in his direction when she sees him on that side.
3) Irvin never stumbles, leans... nothing at all to say a "Drunken gait."
4) What is very clear is the manager is not happy with HER. If these employees had heard these comments made, especially the security guy that was walking around the bar and the manager, why didnt they intervene at that exact moment.
I can promise you if what Irvin is accused of saying was uttered to any female that I was in a group with and I heard it, I would IMMEDIATELY have stepped right in the middle of them and said, who man, that **** is way out of line and walked my friend away from him. Did I miss that part of the video?
Im till waiting on someone to show me the employees that approached Mike and the lady that clealry could see she was uncomfortable to intervene. Where ar ethey???/ Taking the selfie with him and then shaking his hand as they pointed out which way the elevator was? Someone tell me at which minute mark I can find these co-workers at?
Sorry Reid but the only one spinning alternative facts has been you today. Very many of them. Today is not good for Irvin's side. His witnesses are all but discredited and the video happened almost exactly the way Marriott said down to her backing up (in contrast to Irvin's lawyer's claim) and Mike slapping himself 3 times, things you said you wanted to see on the video to give Marriott credence. Both happened. You're silent on those points now.
1. That manager claps to get her attention clearly. He doesn't even notice Mike until he sees Mike interject in his trying to get her attention.
2. Lol. She wouldn't have even seen Mike from the angle she was walking in as there were 2 pillars in the path. She actually looks left into the bar and keeps walking around the outside, maybe to avoid that manager. Mike is clearly headed to the elevators, looks at her a few seconds and then changes his angle towards her, speeding up even to get to her as another poster pointed out.
3. I don't see a drunken gait. He's an animated person anyway so it'd be hard to tell the difference regardless.
4. Agree on the manager. Maybe that's why she was trying to avoid to the outside of the pillar in the first place. As for security, it would seem to me that you want to have an intention play out or you miss being able to back up a report if one is made. Nothing physical was going to play out because they were there. If you're there patrolling a bar, you know there could be violent drunks but you'd need to hear/see a physical threat being made to prevent one. A disgusting comment isn't going to move them but you can't interrupt one being made either to get the full comment on record. Again, just my supposition. Mike didn't pose much of a physical threat, besides continuing to lean in or step towards her. But they did eventually intervene, enough to get Mike's attention to have him back off. Why do that if it was harmless?
Again, you are not trained security personnel. What you would do or be offended with is immaterial.
The ones who approached Mike were clearly the two security personnel. One of them made himself obvious to Mike. What lady are you talking about? That wasn't in Marriott's account. They mention "employees" which are these 2 security guys. One circled like a shark at the beginning and the other was much more obvious in the end, appearing at 37:00 and then it's he that takes a picture with Mike and sends him to the elevators.
