sacase
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,006
- Reaction score
- 2,193
Ok let's go with your "no no" gesture. It lacks a lot of context, it could be him making a joke to her and her clairifying something or slow down, wait, etc. Context is important with that gesture. But I can give you three gestures that she uses that are positive.Friendly, cordial AND also two distinct "no-no" motions from her which are defensive at least. I've been explaining and re-explaining the friendly, cordial part almost since the beginning of this case.
What I also want to see is if a jury believes Irvin's side of the story is credible given he's publicly said he didn't remember having the conversation or what was said before magically remembering it today while kinda corroborating what Marriott says he said about her not knowing him or about football and that Irvin said she should check him out. Also, that Irvin's lawyer has now told two outright lies in back-to-back press conferences and that this video pretty much went down exactly how Marriott says it did compared to Irvin's side saying the woman had never backed up or that the witnesses said the woman approached Mike when it was clearly the opposite here. You present this to any person who doesn't know Mike or anything about this case from the top and see who they'd be more apt to believe.
Much of the time she is standing with he hands in front of her in a relaxed position. This is typically an ideal position to keep her hands. Its hard to tell but if she had a limp wrist if could signifiy interest in him. While using that pose, she often repeats a palms up gesture, which is a submissive geture as well as one that conveys open and honesty. So she has now shown two submissive getures. The third one she uses is her hands behind her back. She is holding one hand with the other which signify's confidence and dominence. So two submissive positive gesture and one gesture in which she feels confident. Also both handshakes she uses a dominent handshake by keeping her hand over the top.