Well, it depends.
Marriott did allow opposing counsel to view the video and they might argue to the judge that release of the video could affect the privacy rights of individuals in the video, such as minors or other employees not related to the case.
Same thing with documents, HR complaints that contain employee files or identifying information could be an issue for public release, that is why a lot of the times information such as names and employee records might be released with redacted information, basically all blacked out.
Will be up to the judge obviously. People also need to keep in mind that this is a civil lawsuit seeking monetary damages, its not a criminal case and neither Marriott nor any of their employees are on trial here. The burden of proof lies solely with Irvin and his legal team to prove Marriott intentionally and maliciously sought to destroy Irvin's reputation and that all of their actions were guided by this one singular purpose with no other reason being possible.
Its a very high bar to prove a defamation case in civil court.