Is Dak the greatest QB bargain in NFL history?

[JJHLH1]

Russell Wilson, Kurt Warner (I know Kurt wasn't 4 years before a new deal, but I'll take those performances of 3 years over 4 years of team failure) edit: I misread Kurts contract history, he was a bargain for 5 years actually.

Warner was a bargain (huge!) but only for one year. He didn’t start until the 1999 season, when he and the St. Louis Rams won a Super Bowl that year. He subsequently signed a big contract in July 2000, including a then-record signing bonus of $17.5 million.

Nobody has yet named a QB that has played as well as Dak for less money over a 4 year period.

 

[InTheZone]

Warner was a bargain (huge!) but only for one year. He didn’t start until the 1999 season, when he and the St. Louis Rams won a Super Bowl that year. He subsequently signed a big contract in July 2000, including a then-record signing bonus of $17.5 million.

Nobody has yet named a QB that has played as well as Dak for less money over a 4 year period.

Because they already won a ring prior to getting paid...what exactly is the purpose of this thread? What do you benefit from?

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

btw, the OP kind of counting his chickens before all the eggs hatch...what the heck does it mean the best bargain in his first 4 years? so maybe I come up with one, the best bargain in the first 2 years, the best bargain in the first year, the best bargain in the first 3 years, the best bargain in the first 5 years....it seems there was an agenda to choose 4 years....with that said, once Dak gets his deal and in two years we don't have a superbowl, then what do we do...is he the worst bargain in his first 6 years.....

sorry, this was a meaningless, useless post to start...total drivel

 

[Proof]

You telling me Payton would take Dak at 35 million plus over Bridgewater at around 20 to 25?

Bud, not every team has Jerry Jones as their GM lol

Easily

 

[JJHLH1]

what's your point in posting the original comment? what's the purpose? at this point, it seems you are just arguing to win an argument!!

I probably didn’t phrase my original question very well. I tried to make it more clear with subsequent posts.

I’m specifically referring to salary over a 4-year period. I probably should have said long-term bargain to make it clear.

I realize that players like Brady, Wilson, Warner, are better players and better draft bargains. But that wasn’t what I was asking about.

Or to phrase it in a more specific way, has any QB played as well as Dak and been paid less over a 4 year period.

I could honestly care less about winning an argument, so I apologize if that’s the way it comes across. My point is that if the Cowboys couldn’t even make a real playoff run in this window I don’t know if they ever can.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I probably didn’t phrase my original question very well. I tried to make it more clear with subsequent posts.

I’m specifically referring to salary over a 4-year period. I probably should have said long-term bargain to make it clear.

I realize that players like Brady, Wilson, Warner, are better players and better draft bargains. But that wasn’t what I was asking about.

Or to phrase it in a more specific way, has any QB played as well as Dak and been paid less over a 4 year period.

I could honestly care less about winning an argument, so I apologize if that’s the way it comes across. My point is that if the Cowboys couldn’t even make a real playoff run in this window I don’t know if they ever can.

again, what's your point in coming up with that "achievement".....

and one can argue, no QB has come to a team more ready for a superbowl than Dak. and that in the first 3 years, Dak's stats puts him at average. so bargain? depends on your point of view....unless you are attributing all the wins to Dak and then there is a long argument given he had been middle of the pack QB the first 3 years.

sorry, your premise of creating a statistical category for the first 4 years is totally arbitrary and thus my comments.