Is Kendricks available?

[malbis030347]

he may be better than what we have right now...I know he was not resigned but was that his choice or ours?

 

[America's Cowboy]

Eric Kendricks is definitively available. He would certainly perform better than who we currently have starting. Don't know why this coaching staff has not called him yet.

 

[rambo2]

Eric Kendricks is definitively available. He would certainly perform better than who we currently have starting. Don't know why this coaching staff has not called him yet.

They actually could cut Mazi and sign him.

 

[America's Cowboy]

They actually could cut Mazi and sign him.

That would be best. Don't know why this organization keeps dragging its feet?

 

[Coogiguy03]

They actually could cut Mazi and sign him.

POST OF THE DAY!!!

 

[maryquality]

That would be best. Don't know why this organization keeps dragging its feet?

Maybe Eberflus doesn't like Kendricks.

 

[Reality]

Maybe Eberflus doesn't like Kendricks.

I think people forget the main reason Zimmer brought Kendricks in last year was his familiarity with Zimmer's defense.

Eberflus did the same thing with bringing in Sanborn.

I'm not saying Kendricks isn't a good player, I'm just pointing out that there's a reason for why those two signings were made.

 

[phildadon86]

That would be best. Don't know why this organization keeps dragging its feet?

Its the Cowboys.

They waited until a week before the season started to send Parsons packing for the DT we have needed for a decade. This team has needed a DT since the Rams ran us (pun intended) off the field in the playoffs.

Better late than never I guess.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Maybe Eberflus doesn't like Kendricks.

Sounds like it. Big mistake.

 

[exciter]

he may be better than what we have right now...I know he was not resigned but was that his choice or ours?

Lol,
You mean the Kendricks who was the starting MiKE when we were the 31st ranked rush defense last year?

 

[Johannes44]

They actually could cut Mazi and sign him.

They won't cut Mazi. Mazi is going to be around until the very last second of his rookie contract and then quietly cut so that Jerry can save face.

 

[ChuckA1]

Lol,
You mean the Kendricks who was the starting MiKE when we were the 31st ranked rush defense last year?

He was better that who they fielded last Thursday.

 

[BigD_95]

he may be better than what we have right now...I know he was not resigned but was that his choice or ours?

he was awful - slow on reads and just slow - no thanks

 

[silver]

Liufau & Clark should start in front of Sanborn and Murray.

 

[rambo2]

They won't cut Mazi. Mazi is going to be around until the very last second of his rookie contract and then quietly cut so that Jerry can save face.

Keeping a guy that can't play isn't saving face.

 

[rambo2]

Its the Cowboys.

They waited until a week before the season started to send Parsons packing for the DT we have needed for a decade. This team has needed a DT since the Rams ran us (pun intended) off the field in the playoffs.

Better late than never I guess.

And they got a good one.

 

[Chasing6]

he may be better than what we have right now...I know he was not resigned but was that his choice or ours?

I would assume with better DT play Kendrick's would only be better than last season.

 

[phildadon86]

And they got a good one.

You are the same one who said the LBs were massively upgraded were you not?

WHOOPS!

 

[Johannes44]

Keeping a guy that can't play isn't saving face.

Paying a guy to not play is certainly not a Jerry move.

 

[Cowboysheelsreds053]

POST OF THE DAY!!!

Yes